THEORETICAL PRINCIPLES OF JUDICIAL INDEMNITY AS A COMPONENT OF JUDICIAL IMMUNITY
УДК 347.962
DOI 10.37566/2707-6849-2022-1-2(38-39)-3
Serhii DEMCHENKO,
Member of the Parliament of Ukraine
THEORETICAL PRINCIPLES OF JUDICIAL INDEMNITY AS A COMPONENT OF JUDICIAL IMMUNITY
The article analyzes the theoretical principles of judicial indemnity as a component of judicial immunity. The independence of judges is ensured by their inviolability, which has a clearly pragmatic goal, is recognized and approved by the state and society, namely, providing and ensuring the opportunity for a judge to fulfill his direct constitutional duty to administer justice by issuing judicial acts within the limits of his powers without fear that this someone will persecute in some form. The state and society, imposing special requirements on the holders of judicial power and their professional activities, are obliged to provide them with appropriate means of legal protection. Granting judges inviolability corresponds to the generally recognized principles and norms of international law and aims to ensure the foundations of the constitutional system related to the separation of powers, autonomy and independence of the judiciary The problem of regulating indemnity as a component of inviolability is quite complex and multifaceted, which necessitates the study of scientific research by representatives of various branches of legal science. The constitutional provision on the inviolability of a judge establishes one of the important elements of a judge’s status and the most important guarantee of his professional activity. It is aimed at ensuring the foundations of the constitutional system, the principle of separation of powers, the system of checks and balances in the activities of various branches of government, and their interaction. The article defines the concept and signs of judicial indemnity, its differences from judicial immunity, and outlines the issues of its application.
Key words: judicial immunity, judicial indemnity, judicial immunity.
References
Ivantsova A. V. Vyznachennya ponyattya suddivs’kyy indemnitet: zahal’na kharakterystyka ta mizhnarodno-pravovyy analiz. Suchasni vyklyky ta aktual’ni problemy sudovoyi reformy v Ukrayini : Materialy II Mizhnar. nauk.-prakt. konf. (m.Chernivtsi, 18–19 zhovtnya 2018 r.). Chernivtsi, 2018. 22–25 p. [ukr.]
Podkopayev S. V. Dystsyplinarna vidpovidal’nist’ suddiv: sutnist’, mekhanizm realizatsiyi : monohrafiya KH. : VD «INZHEK», 2003. 190 p. [ukr.]
Petruchenko O. A. Latynsko-russkyy slovar’. 9-e yzd., yspr. M.: Yzdanye tovaryshchestva «V. V. Dulenov, naslednyky br. Salaevykh», 1914. 810 p. [russ.]
Shelever, N. V. Imunitet suddiv ta yikh vidpovidal’nist’ Naukovyy visnyk Uzhhorods’koho universytetu. 2011. Vyp. 15. №CH. 1. 79 –83 p. [ukr.]
Strashun B. A. Konstytutsyonnoe (hosudarstvennoe) pravo zarubezhnykh stran. Chast’obshchaya. Tom 1, M., 2000. 346 p. [russ.]
Shchodo zdiysnennya dyskretsiynykh povnovazhen’ administratyvnymy orhanamy: Rekomendatsiya Komitetu Ministriv Rady Yevropy № R (80) 2 vid 11.03.1980 Administratyvna protsedura ta administratyvni posluhy. Zarubizhnyy dosvid i 49 propozytsiyi dlya Ukrayiny. Kyyiv : Fakt, 2003. 469–479 р. [ukr.]
Kalashnyk O. A. Pravovyy status mistsevykh zahal’nykh sudiv v Ukrayini : dyc. .kand. yuryd. nauk : 12.00.10. Odesa, 2016. 231 р. [ukr.]
Rozyn N.N. O voznahrazhdenyy lyts, nevynno pryvlechennykh k uholovnomu sudu. Zhurnal Mynysterstva yustytsyy. SPb., 1897. Noyabr’. № 9. 81-117 р. [russ.]
Shchodo suddiv: nezalezhnist, efektyvnist’ ta obov’yazky: rek. Kom. ministriv Rady Yevropy vid 17.11.2010 r. № R (94)12. URL: http://zakon.rada.gov.ua/cgi-bin/laws/main. cgi?nreg=994_ a38.
Pro sudoustriy i status suddiv: Zakon Ukrayiny vid 02.06.2016 № 1402-VIII. Vidomosti Verkhovnoyi Rady. 2016. № 31. 545 р. [ukr.]
Pro Konstytutsiynyy Sud: Zakon Ukrayiny vid 13 lypnya 2017 r. № 2136-VIII. Vidomosti Verkhovnoyi Rady. 2017. № 35. 376 р. [ukr.]