APPLICATION OF THE LEX SPECIALIS PRINCIPLE TO SOLVING CONFLICTS IN LEGISLATION: ANALYSIS OF COURT PRACTICE
УДК: 342.95
ORCID: 0000-0002-2353-4836
DOI 10.37566/2707-6849-2022-1-2(38-39)-7
Ян БЕРНАЗЮК,
Judge of the Cassation Administrative Court in the composition
of the Supreme Court, Doctor of Law, Professor,
Honored Lawyer of Ukraine
APPLICATION OF THE LEX SPECIALIS PRINCIPLE TO SOLVING CONFLICTS IN LEGISLATION: ANALYSIS OF COURT PRACTICE
The article is devoted to revealing the content of the principle of lex specialis when resolving conflicts in legislation. On the basis of the analysis of legislation, national judicial practice and the practice of the European Court of Human Rights, the essence and peculiarities of the application of the approach by the courts regarding the priority of the norms of a special law over the norms of the general law when resolving a conflict in legislation between acts of the same legal force have been clarified. The author substantiated that in order to overcome conflicts in legislation between norms of the same legal force, there is an approach to give priority to special norms over general ones, which is due to the effect of the principle of Lex specialis (special law, special norm). It has been established that according to this approach, in the event of a discrepancy between a general and a special law, a special law applies, as well as the principle of Lex specialis derogat generali, the essence of which boils down to the fact that a special law cancels the effect of a general law; the special norm has priority over the general one. It is argued that when applying the approach to overcome the conflict in legislation based on the principle of Lex specialis derogat generali, some problematic issues may arise in judicial practice. The author singled out the following problematic issues: what criteria characterize the law as «special»; how to act if there is a conflict between two special laws; which approach has priority: a special (substantive) or a later adopted act (temporal); what approach to apply if acts of the same legal force and special acts are adopted on the same day; how to act if acts of the same legal force have different but opposite dates of adoption and entry into force or implementation.
Key words: legal conflict, substantive conflict, special law, administrative proceedings, the Supreme Court, the European Court of Human Rights.
References
Rishennia Konstytutsiinoho Sudu Ukrainy vid 18 chervnia 2020 r. № 5-r(II)/2020. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/va05p710-20#Text [ukr.].
Case of Barankevich v. Russia: decision of the European Court of Human Rights, 26.10.2007, № 10519/03. URL: https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng#{%22fulltext%22:[%22 10519/03%22],%22documentcollectionid2%22:[%22GRANDCHAMBER%22,%22CH AMBER%22],%22itemid%22:[%22001-81950%22]}
Rishennia Yevropeiskoho sudu z prav liudyny u spravi «TOV «Svit rozvah» ta inshi proty Ukrainy» vid 27.09.2019, № 13290/11 ta 2 inshi zaiavy. URL: https://zakon.rada. gov.ua/laws/show/974_e05#Text [ukr.].
Rishennia Yevropeiskoho sudu z prav liudyny u spravi «Shkiria proty Ukrainy» vid 24.06.2021, № 30850/11. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/974_g33#Text [ukr.].
Rishennia Yevropeiskoho sudu z prav liudyny u spravi «Panchenka ta inshykh proty Ukrainy» vid 05.07.2007, № 25681/03. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/ show/974_260#Text [ukr.].
Case of Baka v. Hungary: decision of the European Court of Human Rights, 23.07.2016, № 20261/12. URL: https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng#{%22fulltext%22:[%22Baka%20 v.%20Hungary%22],%22documentcollectionid2%22:[%22GRANDCHAMBER%22,% 22CHAMBER%22],%22itemid%22:[%22001-163113%22]}
Postanova Velykoi Palaty Verkhovnoho Sudu vid 25 travnia 2021 roku u spravi № 923/971/19. URL: https://zakononline.com.ua/court-decisions/show/97628611 [ukr.].
Postanova Velykoi Palaty Verkhovnoho Sudu vid 21 veresnia 2021 roku u spravi № 905/2030/19 (905/1159/20). URL: https://zakononline.com.ua/court-decisions/ show/100359355 [ukr.].
Postanova Verkhovnoho Sudu vid 9 lystopada 2018 roku u spravi № 263/15749/16- a. URL: https://zakononline.com.ua/court-decisions/show/77799030 [ukr.].
Postanova Verkhovnoho Sudu vid 23 chervnia 2020 roku u spravi № 804/9077/16. URL: http://www.reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/89977373 [ukr.].
Postanova Verkhovnoho Sudu u skladi sudovoi palaty z rozghliadu sprav shchodo podatkiv, zboriv ta inshykh obov`iazkovykh platezhiv Kasatsiinoho administratyvnoho sudu vid 26 lystopada 2020 roku u spravi № 500/2486/19. URL: https://reyestr.court. gov.ua/Review/93404515 [ukr.].
Postanova Verkhovnoho Sudu vid 3 kvitnia 2020 roku u spravi № 2540/2576/18. URL: https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/88575707 [ukr.].
Zaverukha O. Evoliutsiia pidkhodiv shchodo zastosuvannia administratyvnymy sudamy strokiv zvernennia do sudu v podatkovykh sporakh, u yakykh bulo vykorystano protseduru dosudovoho vrehuliuvannia sporu. Podatkovi spory v administratyvnomu sudochynstvi: Zbirnyk tez dopovidei Piatoi Mizhnarodnoi naukovo-praktychnoi konferentsii «Administratyvna yustytsiia v Ukraini: problemy teorii ta praktyky» (Kyiv, 4–5 lypnia 2022 roku). Kyiv: Kompaniia «VAITE», 2022 r. 240 s. [ukr.]
Postanova Verkhovnoho Sudu vid 10 lypnia 2018 roku u spravi № 461/6426/17. URL: https://zakononline.com.ua/court-decisions/show/75253727 [ukr.].
Postanova Verkhovnoho Sudu Ukrainy vid 23 chervnia 2015 roku u spravi № 753/22929/14-a. URL: https://zakononline.com.ua/court-decisions/show/46570809 [ukr.].
Postanova Verkhovnoho Sudu vid 22 sichnia 2019 roku u spravi № 826/4924/16. URL: https://zakononline.com.ua/court-decisions/show/79381970 [ukr.].
Postanova Verkhovnoho Sudu vid 28 serpnia 2020 roku u spravi № 821/194/17. URL: https://zakononline.com.ua/court-decisions/show/91103875 [ukr.]
Postanova Verkhovnoho Sudu vid 1 liutoho 2022 roku sprava № 640/18584/20. URL: https://zakononline.com.ua/court-decisions/show/103035273 [ukr.].
Postanova Sudovoi palaty z rozghliadu sprav shchodo zakhystu sotsialnykh prav Kasatsiinoho administratyvnoho sudu u skladi Verkhovnoho Sudu vid 31 bereznia 2021 roku u spravi № 805/430/18-a. URL: https://zakononline.com.ua/court-decisions/ show/96015811 [ukr.].
Okrema dumka suddiv Kasatsiinoho administratyvnoho sudu u skladi Verkhovnoho Sudu Bernaziuka Ya.O. ta Kravchuka V.M. na postanovu Sudovoi palaty z rozghliadu sprav shchodo zakhystu sotsialnykh prav Kasatsiinoho administratyvnoho sudu u skladi Verkhovnoho Sudu vid 31 bereznia 2021 roku u spravi № 805/430/18-a. URL: https:// zakononline.com.ua/court-decisions/show/96179375 [ukr.].