THE ISSUE OF IMPROVEMENT OF MODERN LAW ENFORCEMENT MECHANISM (ON EXAMPLE OF COURT PRECEDENT)
Andriy DRISHLUK,
Judge of the Court of Appeal of Odessa region, Secretary of the Chamber for Civil Cases of the Court of Appeal of Odessa region, Candidate of Law, Associate Professor
THE ISSUE OF IMPROVEMENT OF MODERN LAW ENFORCEMENT MECHANISM (ON EXAMPLE OF COURT PRECEDENT)
The article deals with the current state of enforcement mechanism in the context of precedent in modern court practice and the potential recognition of court precedent as a source of law. According to the investigation, author suggests ways for realization of law enforcement mechanism in Ukraine. Besides, he considers precedent being a source of law and underlines its coexistence with positive law which is traditionally main source of law. Author makes a suggestion that principle of law supremacy can be realized only on the materially-legal constituent of dispute decision according to the procedural requirements of the current forms of legal proceedings. It is noted that for rules of law application (legal principles), the possibility of non-compliance with norms of material and procedure legislation application needs legislative determination.
Key words: mechanism of law enforcement, court precedent, court practice, the European Court of Human Rights, the general provisions (legal principles).
References
Popov Y. Y. Case law in the context of universality of court decisions and Ukrainian prospects. URL: http://popov-yuyu.narod.ru/27_Precedent_ru.htm. [ukr.]
Shevchuk S. Judicial law-making: world experience and prospects in Ukraine: monograph. К .: Referat, 2007. 640 p. [ukr.]
Bondarenko-Zelinska N., Zelinsky A. The legal system of Ukraine and judicial precedent: the possibility of coexistence. Legal week. 2008. 27 trav. URL: http://www.legalweekly.com.ua/article/?uid=417. [ukr.]
Shevchuk S. Judicial protection of human rights: The practice of the European Court of Human Rights in the context of the Western legal tradition: a monograph. View. 2nd, corrected, supplemented. К .: Referat, 2007. 848 p. [ukr.]
Paliyuk V. P. Article 10 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms: Ukrainian legislation and case law: practice. way. Mykolaiv: Illion LLC, 2010. 554 p. [ukr.]
Mazur M. V. Acts of judicial authorities as a source of constitutional law of Ukraine: dis. ... cand. jurid. Science: 12.00.02. Kharkiv, 2009. 233 p. [ukr.]
Lichman L. G. Significance of legal positions of the Supreme Court of Ukraine for law enforcement practice Legea si Viata. Moldova. 2014. No 3/3 (267). Pp. 92–95. [russ.]
Drishlyuk A. I. Judicial precedent as a source of civil law. Scientific notes of the International Humanities University. 2005. Vip. 2: Humanities and law. Pp. 76–81. [ukr.]
Drishlyuk A. I .Judicial precedent as a source of law and its types. Current policy issues: Coll. Science. wash. Vip. 28. Odessa: PE "Phoenix", 2006. S. 141-150. [ukr.]
Drishlyuk A. I. Overcoming gaps in civil law and legislation of Ukraine (in terms of "judicial precedent"). Current issues of state and law: Coll. Science. wash. Odessa: Jurid. lit., 2006. Issue. 25. pp. 221–224. [ukr.]
Application of judgments of the European Court of Human Rights in judicial practice: problems of interpretation. URL: http://protokol.com.ua/ua/zastosuvannya_rishen_evropeyskogo_sudu_z_prav_lyudini_v_sudoviy_praktitsi_problemi_interpretatsii/. [ukr.]
Maidanyk R. A. Civil law: General part: monograph. K .: Alerta, 2012. 472 s. [ukr.]
Pridvorova M. N. Judicial practice in the legal system of the Russian Federation: diss. ... candyurid. Science: special. 12.00.01. Tambov, 2003. 201 p. [russ.]
Drishlyuk A. I. On the distinction between judicial practice and judicial precedent. Current policy issues: Coll. Science. etc. Vip. 27 / head. ed. S. V. Kivalov; ONYUA, South Ukraine. Gender Center. research. Odessa: Phoenix, 2005. 232 p. P.152–155. [ukr.]
Averin A. .V Judicial law application and formation of scientific and legal consciousness of judges (problems of theory and practice): diss. ... Dr. Rayurid. Science: special. 12.00.01. Saratov, 2004. 382 p. [russ.]
Rafikov R. R. Judicial law enforcement: theoretical and legal analysis: diss. ... cand. jurid. Science: 12.00.01. Ufa, 2006. 184 p. [russ.]
Drishlyuk A. I. The practice of the European Court of Human Rights as a factor influencing the system of sources of civil and civil procedural law of Ukraine. Law: Science. Bulletin of Uzhhorod. nat. un-tu. 2014. No 24. S. 37–40. [ukr.]
Karmazina K. Y. The mechanism of interaction of sources of continental and general law: author's dissertation. ... cand. jurid. Science: 12.00.01. –K., 2011. S. 12–13. [ukr.]