SOME PROBLEM QUESTIONS OF STATING CHARGE AND HIS VALUE IN AN INDICTMENT ARE IN A JUDICIAL TRIAL
DmytroSVOIAK,
Judge, the Pereyaslav-Khmelnytskyi City Court of Kyiv Region, Teacher of the National School of Judges of Ukraine
SOME PROBLEM QUESTIONS OF STATING CHARGE AND HIS VALUE IN AN INDICTMENT ARE IN A JUDICIAL TRIAL
There are analyzed, the definition and understanding of the concept of “the formulation of the charge” based on examples from judicial practice as well as procedural significance and consequences of its incorrectness, including incompleteness, in the indictment, as in the legal science and in the practice of law enforcement in the article.
Also there are proposed examples of the definition of “formulation of the prosecution” in both scientific works and in law-enforcement activities and the definition of “formulation of the charge” on the basis of the investigated material.
It is noted about the need and the key role of the formulation of the prosecution in the indictment as an element of the prosecution, the lack of compliance with which legislative requirements or lack thereof, is an obstacle to judicial review, with the observance of the tasks and general principles of criminal proceedings. It is argued that the formulation of the charge in the indictment is an independent element of the charge and can not be identified with the statement of the actual circumstances of the criminal proceedings and its legal qualification. In order to comply with the clarity of the wording of the prosecution, it should not include circumstances that do not affect the confirmation of the guilt of the person and the provisions of the Criminal Code of Ukraine, for which the person is prosecuted, are not foreseen by the disposition.
There is a lack of legal grounds for appointing a new trial in the court of first instance based on the results of an appeal review of a court decision on the merits, in the event of an insufficiency or lack of wording of the charge in the indictment.
For further enforcement, the author suggests defining the concept of “formulating the prosecution” as a concise and precise statement of the allegation that a particular person was guilty of committing a criminal offense on the basis of actually established circumstances of the criminal proceedings, which are of legal significance for solving the issue of bringing that person to liability for a specific article of the Criminal Code Ukraine in the context of the formula of legal qualification.
Key words: accusation, formulation of charge, indictment, return of indictment to prosecutor.
References
Criminal Procedure Code of Ukraine dated April 13, 2012 No. 4651-VI, ed. as of 04/24/2018 URL: http://zakon3.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/4651-17. [ukr.]
Code of Criminal Procedure of Ukraine of December 28, 1960, No. 1001-05, became invalid as of November 19, 2012, ground 4651-17. URL: http://zakon3.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/1001-05. [ukr.]
Judgment of the Supreme Court of Ukraine dated 06.07.2006. URL: http://zakon2.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/n0074700-06. [ukr.]
Decision of the Board of Judges of the Judicial Chamber in Criminal Cases of the Court of Appeal of Zhytomyr Region of May 27, 2015 in Case No. 287/359/14-k. URL: http://www.reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/44886935. [ukr.]
Judgment of the Court of Appeal of Zhytomyr Region of November 04, 2015 in the case. No. 287/359/14-к. URL: http://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/53295723. [ukr.]
Decision of the Board of Judges of the Trial Chamber on the Criminal Cases of the Court of Appeal of Zhytomyr Region of 14 April 2016 in Case No. 287/359/14-k. URL: http://www.reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/57138150. [ukr.]
Nozdryakov S. V. When drafting acts, prosecutors do not pay proper attention to the presentation of the circumstances and motives for committing the violation. Law and business. 2015. 21.11–27.11. URL: http://zib.com.ua/en/119943-skladayuchi_akti_prokurori_ne_pridilyayut_nalezhnoi_uvagi_vi.html. [ukr.]
Decision of the Board of Judges of the Judicial Chamber in Criminal Cases of the Court of Appeal of the Kyiv Region of October 13, 2015 in Case No. 373/1020/15-k. URL: http://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/52273265. [ukr.]
Generalization of case law on ensuring the right of defense by local courts and the Court of Appeal of Zaporizhzhia region for the period of 2013 URL: zpa.court.gov.ua/userfiles/uz_SH_.doc. [ukr.]
Judgment of the Supreme Court of Ukraine of November 24, 2016 No. 5-328 ks 16. URL:http://www.scourt.gov.ua/clients/vsu/vsu.nsf/(documents)/CD958A2554CF7AC3C225808800430727. [ukr.]
Crime Skills Theory: A Multimedia Educational. tool. National Academy of Internal Affairs / incl .: A. Savchenko, V. Kuznetsov, L. Kuznetsova, L. Vilkhova. URL: http://www.naiau.kiev.ua/books/mnp_tkz/Files/L1/L1_7.htm. [ukr.]
Svoyak D. V. Relationship between material and procedural significance of motive and purpose of crime. Legality problems: coll. of sciences. wash. 2016, No. 132, pp. 175–185. URL: http://plaw.nlu.edu.ua/article/view/63982. [ukr.]
Ortinsky V. L., Grishchuk V. K., Matsko M. A. and others. Fundamentals of the State and Law of Ukraine: a textbook. K .: Knowledge, 2008. 583 p. subsection 11.13. URL: http://pidruchniki.com/15010922/pravka/kvalifikatsiya_zlochiniv#62. [ukr.]
ECtHR judgment in the case of Vashchenko v. Ukraine (Application No. 26864/03). URL: http://zakon3.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/974_401. [ukr.]
Grinyuk V. O. To the question of the validity of the charge in the indictment. Bulletin of criminal proceedings. K., 2015. № 4. P. 25–31. [ukr.]
Mikulin V. P. Peculiarities of Formulating Prosecution of Organized Crime. Problems of combating crime in the sphere of economic activity: materials international. Research Practice Conf., December 15–16, 1998. Kharkiv, 1999. P. 247–256. [ukr.]
Ponomarenko D. V. There is no crime without elements. What are the typical mistakes prosecutors make in an indictment and what are the procedural consequences of that? URL: http://zib.com.ua/en/print/122577-yakih_typovih_pomilok_pripuskayutsya_prokurori_v_nobinuvalno.html. [ukr.]
Generalization of the Court of Appeal's exercise of procedural authority to appoint a new trial in a court of first instance, approved on 17.01.2017 by a meeting of the High Specialized Court of Ukraine for civil and criminal cases. URL: http://sc.gov.ua/en/supply_courses.html. [ukr.]