HAGUE CONVENTION ON THE CIVIL ASPECTS OF INTERNATIONAL CHILD ABDUCTION: CONTENT AND METHODOLOGICAL APPROACHES TO THE APPLICATION IN JUDICIAL EDUCATION

UDC 343.62-053.2:347.962

ORCID: 0000-0002-9800-8785

ORCID: 0000-0002-8562-0131

DOI 10.37566/2707-6849-2019-3(28)-6

(PDF)

 

FULEY Tetiana,

The Head of Department of the National School of judges of Ukraine, Candidate of Juridicial Sciences,honored lawer of Ukraine

KUCHIV Oksana,

Leading expert of the National School of judges of Ukraine

 

HAGUE CONVENTION ON THE CIVIL ASPECTS OF INTERNATIONAL CHILD ABDUCTION: CONTENT AND METHODOLOGICAL APPROACHES  TO THE APPLICATION IN JUDICIAL EDUCATION

 

The article is focused on the most essential issues of the application of the Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction of 25 October 1980 (“the Hague Convention”) in the judgements of Ukrainian courts and some methodological aspects of workshop development on the topic.

The Hague Convention recently has been applied more often as an important international act. Moreover, there are at least 3 judgements of the European Court of Human Rights v. Ukraine on the matter (Chabrowski v. Ukraine, no. 61680/10, 17 January 2013; Vilenchik v. Ukraine, no. 21267/14, 3 October 2017, M.R. and D.R. v. Ukraine, no. 63551/13, 22 May 2018). The Court reiterates that in the area of international child abduction, the obligations that Article 8 of the ECHR imposes on the Contracting State must be interpreted, in particular, in the light of the Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction of 25 October 1980 which also attaches paramount importance to the best interests of the child.

Therefore such a topic was selected for a workshop to be developed and implemented in the educational process of the National School of Judges of Ukraine (NSJU).

According to the Concept of National Standards of Judicial Training, which was approved by the Science and Methodology Council of the NSJU, and later became a part of the Rules of Procedure of the NSJU, all training courses for judges and candidates are developed taking into consideration three dimensions – so-called 3D (dimension) – which encompass knowledge, skills, and values. Therefore the workshop on the Hague Convention is designed using all 3D, and is aimed to consolidate knowledge and to develop judicial skills in application of the Hague Convention, Article 8 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (ECHR) and ECtHR case law as well as to contribute to strengthening of the values of respect for human rights, rule of law, and enforcement of Ukraine’s international obligations.

In order to achieve these goals, there certain tools and techniques that are effective in basic courses on the ECtHR case-law were used. In particular, the use of interactive adult learning methods – mini lectures, filling the analytical framework, video review, express survey etc.

The development of the workshops took place jointly with a scientific research in this field, specifically focused of the new Supreme Court jurisprudence, the best practices and lessons learned. The results of the research has been used for the workshop development with the help of the modern innovative tools.

Key words: Hague Convention of 25 October 1980 (Convention of Abduction), international child abduction, place of ordinary residence, Article 8 of the ECHR, practice of the ECHR, judicial education, methodological support, workshop.

 

References

Amosha  O.,  Zemlyankin A., Moiseev G. The basis of innovative development. Problems and prospects of interaction between academic science and education. Bulletin of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine.  2006.  № 10. P. 3–16 [Ukr.].

NSJU Development Strategy for 2016-2020.  URL:  http://nsj.gov.ua [Ukr.].

Krasovskaya OO Methodical bases of introduction of innovative technologies in the professional training of future elementary school teachers in the field of art education. Psychological and pedagogical bases of humanization of educational process in school and university. 2013.  Vip. 1.  P. 37–46. URL: http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/Ppog_2013_1_7 [Ukr.].

Standardized requirements for the preparation and conduct of seminars-workshops approved by the Scientific and Methodological Council of the National School of Judges of Ukraine (Minutes No. 1 of January 21, 2019). URL: http://nsj.gov.ua [Ukr.].

Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction, October 25, 1980. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/995_188 [Ukr.].

Decision of the Grand Chamber of the Supreme Court of 17.10.2018 in Case No. 402/428/16-c. URL: http://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/77361954 [Ukr.].

Fulei T., Burukovskaya N., Budnichenko T., Savchenko G.  Methodical recommendations for trainers on the development and conduct of trainings. Kyiv: FOP Demchinskiy OV, 2017.  92 p. [Ukr.].

Fulei T. Peculiarities of consideration of cases of return of a child by courts. Court practice. 2012.  № 7-8.  P. 33–45 [Ukr.].

On the implementation in the territory of Ukraine of the Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction: Resolution No. 952 of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine of July 10, 2006. URL:  https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/952-2006-%D0%BF [Ukr.].

Y. Chernyak, The Hague Convention of 1980 on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction in the System of International Legal Acts of Ukraine. Bulletin of the Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv. 2015.  № 1 (43).  P. 78–81 [Ukr.].

Generalization of the practice of the courts in the civil cases of the Convention on the Civil Law Aspects of International Child Abduction 2017. URL: http://search.ligazakon.ua/l_doc2.nsf/link1/VRR00216.html [Ukr.].

Judgment of the Civil Court of Cassation dated 15.08.2018 in Case No. 201/3664/17. URL:  http://www.reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/75970163 [Ukr.].

Judgment of the Court of Cassation of 02/27/2019 in Case No. 52/24280/17. URL: http://www.reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/80235727 [Ukr.].

Judgment of the Civil Court of Cassation of 17.12.2018 in Case No. 461/4678/17. URL: http://www.reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/78715682 [Ukr.].

Judgment of the Civil Court of Cassation of 24.10.2018 in Case No. 344/12248/16. URL:  http://www.reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/78110482 [Ukr.].

Judgment of the Civil Court of Cassation of 4 July 2018 in Case No. 640/688/17. URL: http://www.reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/75241763 [Ukr.].

Judgment of the Civil Court of Cassation of 27 February 2019 in Case No. 757/25106/16-c. URL: http://www.reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/81073263 [Ukr.].

Judgment of the Civil Court of Cassation of 10 April 2019 in Case No. 757/51046/17-c. URL: http://www.reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/81436871 [Ukr.].

MR and DR v. Ukraine: ECtHR decision of 2 May 2018, Application No. 63551/13. URL:  https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/974_c87 [Ukr.].