УДК 347.986 PDF
ORCID: 0000-0002-7669-0576
ORCID: 0000-0002-6648-9764
DOI 10.37566/2707-6849-2021-1(34)-2
Nana BAKAIANOVA,
Headб the Department of Organization of Judicial, Law Enforcement Bodies and Advocacy of the National University "Odessa Law Academy", Doctor of Law, Professor, Honored Lawyer of Ukraine
Andrii KUBAIENKO,
Associate Professor, the Department of Organization of Judicial, Law Enforcement Bodies and Advocacy of the National University "Odessa Law Academy", Candidate of Law Sciences, Associate Professor
INSTITUTE OF THE JUDICIAL SUPERVISION AND
THE PROVISION OF METHODOLOGICAL ASSISTANCE TO JUDGES IN UKRAINE
The paper is devoted to analysis of the current concerns of the judicial supervision and significance of the provision of methodological assistance to judges considering the historical experience. It is indicated that provision of the methodological assistance to judges is particularly important under current conditions as it ensures administration of fair and impartial justice. Every person’s right to fair trial based on supremacy of the law is achieved via accomplishing certain powers both procedural nature and out-of-court procedures. Procedural powers of the court are realized during consideration of a case by the corresponding judicial jurisdiction while the out-of-court powers are accomplished when ensuring so-called functions which main objective is to provide for the unified judicial practice. Formation of the unified judicial practice can be achieved provided a similar application of all norms of the law of substance and procedural law only because the law should equally apply to everybody under similar circumstances.
The paper states that delegation of powers to the court of appeal, as regards provision of the methodological assistance to local courts in administration of legislation, preconditions certain activity of the court and its chairman aimed at accomplishing this authority and presence of the levers to respond to problems arising in the judicial practice. Practical exercise of powers by the court of appeal, as regards provision of the methodological assistance to local courts, may not be connected with the institute of supervision only because there exist other kinds of such assistance provision.
It is emphasized in the paper that the terms “supervisor” and “supervision” may not refer to the activity of courts and judges as regards the meaning, and do not meet the constitutional principle of the independence of judges. The authors indicate that filing a disciplinary complaint against judges in connection with the results of the methodological assistance which the supervising judges provide contains signs of the supervision powers and external influence that doesn’t meet the requirements of the effective legislation of Ukraine concerning judicial machinery and status of judges. The conclusions state a necessity of the legislative regulation of the methodological assistance which the higher judicial courts provide to the lower level courts to improve quality of court judgments and court activity in this sphere.
Keywords: methodological assistance, court supervision, powers of judges, forms of the methodological assistance.
References
On the Judiciary of the Ukrainian SSR: Law of June 30, 1960. Information of the Verkhovna Rada of the Ukrainian SSR. 1960. № 23 (repealed) [ukr.]
Golubovska I. O., Shovkovy V. M., Lefterova O. M. (2012) Multilingual legal dictionary-reference book. Kyiv: Publishing and Printing Center “Kyiv University”, 543 p. [ukr.]
Great Ukrainian encyclopedia. Thematic register of slogans in the field of “Legal Sciences” (2017) Compilers: Babka V. L., Shumilo M. M.; for order. prof. Kiridon A. M. Kyiv: State Scientific Institution “Encyclopedic Publishing House”, 152 p. [ukr.]
On the Judiciary of Ukraine: Law of the Ukrainian SSR of 05.06.1981 № 2022-X. Information of the Verkhovna Rada. 1981. № 24. Article 357 (repealed). [ukr.]
Law of Ukraine № 3018-III On the Judiciary of Ukraine (2002) As amended up to Act of February 7, 2002. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/3018-14#Text (repealed) [ukr.]
Law of Ukraine №2453-VI On the judiciary and the status of judges (2010). As amended up to Act of July 7, 2010. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2453-17 (repealed) [ukr.]
Law of Ukraine № 1402-VIII On the judiciary and the status of judges (2016). As amended up to Act of June 20, 2020. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/1402-19 [ukr.]
Malyarenko V. T. (2013) Regarding the main problems of the judiciary in Ukraine. Word of the National School of Judges of Ukraine, 1, 39–49. [ukr.]
Protocol № 7 (1984) to the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms of November 22. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/994_804#Text [ukr.]
International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights of December 16, 1966. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/995_043#Text [ukr.]
Constitution of Ukraine (1996). As amended up to Act of January 01, 2020. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/254%D0%BA/96-%D0%B2%D1%80 [ukr.]
Conclusion № 11 (2008) of the Advisory Council of European Judges to the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe on the quality of judgments. URL: http://court.gov.ua/userfiles/visn_11_2008.pdf [ukr.]
Romanyuk Y. M. (2012) Unity of judicial practice: theoretical principles of ensuring and improving legislative regulation. Bulletin of the Supreme Court of Ukraine, 5, 37–42. [ukr.]
Shevchuk S. V. (2013) Ensuring the unity of judicial practice in the existence of a specialized jurisdiction. Law of Ukraine, 9, 306–324. [ukr.]
Demenchuk M. O. (2019) The role of the Supreme Court in ensuring the unity of judicial practice: a monograph. Odessa: Phoenix. 176 p. [ukr.]
Methodical recommendations on the provision of methodological assistance by the Khmelnytsky Court of Appeal to local courts in the application of the legislation: approved by the decision of the meeting of judges of the Khmelnytsky Court of Appeal № 6 of January 25, 2019. URL: https://kma.court.gov.ua/sud4820/info_sud/lokalni/metodychni [ukr.]
Vilgushinsky M. Y. (2013) Courts of general jurisdiction in the system of relations with the subjects of power and the public: dis. ... Dr. Jurid. Sciences: 12.00.10 / Nat. University “Odessa Law Academy”. Odessa. [ukr.]