AN ANTI-CORRUPTION VALUE OF ADMINISTRATIVE AND LEGAL RESTRICTIONS OF JOINT WORK OF NEAR PERSONS IN JUSTICE SYSTEM
AN ANTI-CORRUPTION VALUE OF ADMINISTRATIVE AND LEGAL RESTRICTIONS OF JOINT WORK OF NEAR PERSONS IN JUSTICE SYSTEM
УДК 343.35
DOI 10.37566/2707-6849-2021-2(35)-6
Oksana POLNA,
Director, the Lviv Regional Branch
National School of Judges of Ukraine
AN ANTI-CORRUPTION VALUE OF ADMINISTRATIVE AND LEGAL RESTRICTIONS OF JOINT WORK OF NEAR PERSONS IN JUSTICE SYSTEM
The article focuses on the formulation of an urgent comprehensive scientific thought on the anti-corruption value of the administrative and legal restriction of the closely affiliated persons’ collaboration in the justice system of Ukraine. It is a justified restriction of the citizens’ rights to access professional public service in the justice system, provided by national administrative legislation, to continue public service and to exercise a career in this system, by preventing the conclusion of a service contract, blocking the promotion of persons, if this predetermines about direct subordination to a closely affiliated person; termination of official legal relations with persons who are in a relationship of direct subordination to a closely affiliated person.
It is noted that the general anti-corruption essence of the restriction under consideration is manifested in the fact that this restriction appears as a «personnel barrier» for increasing corruption risks in the justice system due to the implementation of personnel policy, as well as a “personnel instrument” for correcting situations when a violation of the corresponding restrictions takes place.
Considering the concept and essence of limiting the collaboration of closely affiliated persons in the justice system, the author proves that the anti-corruption value of such a limitation is that it: while restricting the joint work of closely affiliated persons in the justice system, makes it impossible for nepotism as a separate manifestation of corruption to arise in this system; is a real barrier that reduces the dynamics of the spread of corruption and limits its scale (primarily, in the form of nepotism) in the system of public administration subjects in Ukraine in general and in the justice system in particular; contributes to increasing the authority of judges, professional public service in general and the level of respect and trust of society in the judiciary, the state, as well as reducing legal nihilism in society; maximizes positive incentives for lawful behavior of citizens in general and professional public servants in the justice system, in particular; is the actual result of a public demand for a decrease in the level of tolerance to corruption in the public administration system in general and in justice system, in particular.
In the conclusions to the article, it is noted that non-compliance with the administrative and legal restrictions on the collaboration of closely affiliated persons in the justice system creates a situation in which the public service bodies in this system are filled with close persons, who may enter into a corruption conspiracy to use the common good and public interest in their own (personal) interests, which is unacceptable because it distorts the purpose of the existence of the state in general and the judicial power, in particular.
Keywords: administrative and legal restrictions, anti-corruption value, corruption in the justice system, joint work of closely affiliated persons, justice system, personnel barrier, personnel tool.
References
Shuklina, N. H., Heorhitsa, A. Z. On the question to the content of the constitutional and legal category «democracy» [Do pytannia pro zmist konstytutsiino-pravovoi katehorii «demokratiia»]. Scientific Bulletin of Chernivtsi University (Series Law). 2003. Vol. 172. P. 46–51 [ukr.]
Akhtyrska, N. M. International cooperation during criminal proceedings in relation to corruption offences: subjects and plenary powers [Mizhnarodne spivrobitnytstvo pid chas kryminalnoho provadzhennia shchodo koruptsiinykh pravoporushen: subiekty ta povnovazhennia]. Scientific Bulletin of Uzhhorod National University (Series Law). 2015. Vol. 34 (3). P. 67–70 [ukr.]
Zarosylo, V. O., Hladky, V. V. Bribery as a Basic Form of Corruption [Khabarnytstvo yak bazysna forma proiavu koruptsii]. Journal of the South Regional Center of National Academy of Legal Sciences of Ukraine. 2018. Vol. 16. P. 123–139 [ukr.]
Akhtyrska, N. M. International experience in the fight against corruption as a vector of formation of the National Anti-Corruption Policy: Review of Romanian legislation [Mizhnarodnyi dosvid borotby z koruptsiieiu yak vektor formuvannia natsionalnoi antykoruptsiinoi polityky: ohliad zakonodavstva Rumunii]. Viche. 2015. Vol. 18. P. 2–5 [ukr.]
Hladky, V. V. Prohibition of nepotism in Ukraine [Zaborona nepotyzmu v Ukraini]. Implementation of the state anti-corruption policy in the international dimension: Proceedings of the III International Scientific and Practical Conference, Kyiv, December 7, 2018 р. Kyiv: NAIA, 2018. Vol. 2. P. 335–338 [ukr.]
Nonik, V.V. Mechanisms of formation and implementation of anti-corruption policy in Ukraine [Mekhanizmy formuvannia ta realizatsii antykoruptsiinoi polityky v Ukraini]: Dissertation on Doctor of Science in Public Administration: 25.00.02. Mykolayiv, 2019. 402 p. [ukr.]
Komirchyi, P. O. Administrative and legal bases for public service in law enforcement area of Ukraine [Administratyvno-pravovi zasady publichnoi sluzhby u pravookhoronnii sferi Ukrainy]: Dissertation on Doctor of Legal Sciences degree: 12.00.07. Kyiv, 2020. 611 p. [ukr.]
Novak, A. M. Theoretical and methodological essentials of formation and implementation national anti-corruption policy. [Teoretyko-metodolohichni zasady formuvannia ta realizatsii natsionalnoi antykoruptsiinoi polityky]: Dissertation on Doctor of Science in Public Administration: 25.00.01. Dnipro, 2019. 562 p. [ukr.]
Korotkych, A. U. The problems of legal responsibility of public servants under the labour laws of Ukraine [Problemy yurydychnoi vidpovidalnosti derzhavnykh sluzhbovtsiv za trudovym zakonodavstvom Ukrainy]: Dissertation on Doctor of Legal Sciences degree: 12.00.05. Kyiv, 2019. 472 p. [ukr.]
Nastiuk, V. Y., Bielievtseva, V. V., Klok, O. V. Administrative and legal problems of combating corruption in Ukraine [Administratyvno-pravovi problemy protydii koruptsii v Ukraini]: monograph / ed. by V. Y. Nastiuk. Kharkiv: Pravo, 2017. 216 p. [ukr.]
Shinkarenko, N. V. Administrative and legal mechanism to prevent corruption within the police agencies [Administratyvno-pravovyi mekhanizm zapobihannia koruptsii v orhanah politsii]. Bulletin of Kharkiv National University of Internal Affairs. 2016. № 4 (75). P. 209–215 [ukr.]
General theoretical, administrative and criminal legal bases of conceptualization of anti-corruption reform in Ukraine [Zahalnoteoretychni, administratyvno- ta kryminalno-pravovi osnovy kontseptualizatsii antykoruptsiinoi reformy v Ukraini]: monograph / Ed. by O. O. Dudorov, T. O. Kolomoiets, S. M. Kushnir, O. L. Makarenkov. Zaporizhzhia: Helvetica, 2019. 476 p. [ukr.]
Prikhodko, A. A. Administrative and legal support for preventing and countering corruption in Ukraine in the context of European integration [Administratyvno-pravove zabezpechennia zapobihannia ta protydii koruptsii v Ukraini za umov yevrointehratsii]: Dissertation on Doctor of Legal Sciences degree: 12.00.07. Dnipro, 2020. 485 p. [ukr.]
Onishchuk, M. V. The supremacy of the Constitution as a fundamental principle of the state of justice. Viche. 2010. Vol. 18. P. 6–7 [ukr.]
Onishchuk, M. V., Savchyn, M. V. Direct effect of the Constitution and implementation of its provisions in administrative justice [Priama diia Konstytutsii ta implementatsiia yii polozhen v administratyvnomu sudochynstvi]. Slovo of the National School of Judges of Ukraine. 2020. № 2 (31). С. 6–26. doi:10.37566/2707-6849-2020-2(31)-1 [ukr.]