SUBJECTS OF PROTECTION OF PUBLIC (PUBLIC) INTEREST IN ADMINISTRATIVE JUDICIARY
SUBJECTS OF PROTECTION OF PUBLIC (PUBLIC) INTEREST IN ADMINISTRATIVE JUDICIARY
УДК: 342.45
DOI 10.37566/2707-6849-2021-4(37)-7
ORCID: 0000-0002-2353-4836
Jan BERNAZYUK,
judge of the Cassation Administrative Court as part of the Supreme Court, doctor of legal sciences, professor, honored lawyer of Ukraine
SUBJECTS OF PROTECTION OF PUBLIC (PUBLIC) INTEREST IN
ADMINISTRATIVE JUDICIARY
The article is devoted to the definition of entities authorized to form the public (public) interest, as well as entities that are authorized to apply to administrative courts in order to protect the public (public) interest. Based on the analysis of the case law of the European Court of Human Rights, it was found that the subjects that determine the content of public (public) interest are, first of all, state bodies.
It is determined that in Ukraine the most important issues in the field of public and state life are determined by the laws of Ukraine, so the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine is the body tasked with defining the content of public (public) interest. It has been established that the law-making activity of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine is significantly influenced by the public (representatives of civil society institutions) and international organizations (institutions of the European Union, the International Monetary Fund and others).
It is proved that the subjects of protection of public (public) interest are: state bodies in cases specified by law, as their task is to maximize the interests of all social groups to achieve justice in society as the highest good; local governments in order to protect the violated interests of the territorial community; the prosecutor in the absence of a body empowered to protect public (public) interests in the relevant field and in the relevant territory, or improper performance of such tasks by such body; public organizations, which by statutes give the right to protect public (public) interests in a particular area.
Based on the analysis of the legislation of Ukraine, the need to supplement paragraph 3 of Part 1 of Art. 131-1 of the Constitution of Ukraine and Art. 23 of the Law of Ukraine «On the Prosecutor's Office» provisions on the powers of the prosecutor's office to represent, in addition to state, also public interests.
Key words: public (public) interest, subjects of power, prosecutor's office, public organizations, administrative proceedings, Supreme Court.
References
Case of Ramazyan v. Armenia: decision of the European Court of Human Rights, 14.02.2019, № 54769/10. URL: https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/rus#{%22fulltext%22:[%22 54769/10%22],%22itemid%22:[%22001-189789%22]} [engl.]
Case of James and others v. the United Kingdom: decision of the Commission of Human Rights, 21.02.1986, № 8793/79. URL: https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/ rus#{%22fulltext%22:[%22James%20and%20others%20v.%20the%20United%20Kin gdom%22],%22itemid%22:[%22001-57507%22]} [engl.]
Bernazyuk Y.O. Formi uchastі іnstitutіv gromadyans’kogo suspіl’stva u normotvorchomu procesі. Konstitucіjno-pravovі akademіchnі studії. 2017. № 1/2017. S. 43-53. [ukr.]
Pro zabezpechennya uchastі gromads’kostі u formuvannі ta realіzacії derzhavnoї polіtiki: postanova Kabіnetu Mіnіstrіv Ukraїni № 996 vіd 03.11.2010 r. URL: http:// zakon2.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/996-2010-%D0%BF/ print1476126372091567 [ukr.]
Bernazyuk І.M. Formi ta mezhі uchastі mіzhnarodnih organіzacіj u pravotvorchomu procesі v Ukraїnі. Pravo і suspіl’stvo. 2021. № 2. S. 246-253 [ukr.]
Kodeks admіnіstrativnogo sudochinstva Ukraїni: Zakon Ukraїni vіd 06.07.2005 № 2747-IV. URL: http://zakon0.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2747-15 [ukr.]
Kravchuk V. Zahist suspіl’nih іnteresіv u sferі dovkіllya. Materіali prezentacії. URL: https://supreme.court.gov.ua/userfiles/media/prezentatsiia_1.pdf [ukr.]
Postanova Velikoї Palati Verhovnogo Sudu vіd 15.09.2020 u spravі № 469/1044/17. URL: https://reestr.court.gov.ua/Review/92270734 [ukr.]
Bernazyuk Y. Osoblivostі predstavnictva prokurorom іnteresіv derzhavi v sudі: nove zakonodavstvo ta aktual’nі pіdhodi Verhovnogo Sudu. Sudovo-yuridichna gazeta. 2020. URL: https://sud.ua/ru/news/blog/168820-osoblivosti-predstavnitstva-prokurorom-interesiv-derzhavi-v-sudi-nove-zakonodavstvo-ta-aktualni-pidkhodi-verkhovnogo-sudu [ukr.]
Civіl’nij procesual’nij kodeks Ukraїni vіd 18.03.2004 № 1618-IV. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/1618-15#Text [ukr.]
Gospodars’kij procesual’nij kodeks Ukraїni vіd 06.11.1991 № 1798-XII. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/1798-12#Text [ukr.]
Bernazyuk YA. Zvernennya sub’єkta vladnih povnovazhen’ іz pozovom do admіnіstrativnogo sudu: vinyatok chi neobhіdnіst’. Sudovo-yuridichna gazeta. 2020. URL: https://supreme.court.gov.ua/supreme/pres-centr/zmi/918079/ [ukr.]
Postanova Verhovnogo Sudu vіd 20 lyutogo 2020 roku u spravі № 813/52/13-a. URL: http://www.reestr.court.gov.ua/Review/87759943 [ukr.]
Pro mіsceve samovryaduvannya v Ukraїnі: Zakon Ukraїni vіd 21.05.1997 № 280/97-VR. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/280/97-%D0%B2%D1%80#Text [ukr.]
Evropejs’ka hartіya mіscevogo samovryaduvannya: Mіzhnarodnij dokument vіd 15.10.1985. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/994_036#Text [ukr.]
Ugoda pro asocіacіyu mіzh Ukraїnoyu, z odnієї storoni, ta Єvropejs’kim Soyuzom, Evropejs’kim spіvtovaristvom z atomnoї energії і їhnіmi derzhavami-chlenami, z іnshoї storoni: Mіzhnarodnij dokument vіd 27.06.2014. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/ show/984_011#Text [ukr.]
Bernazyuk Y. Zvernennya do admіnіstrativnogo sudu z metoyu zahistu іnteresіv teritorіal’noї gromadi є nevіd’єmnim pravom organu mіscevogo samovryaduvannya. Sudovo-yuridichna gazeta. 2020. URL: https://sud.ua/ru/news/blog/158827-zvernennya-do-administrativnogo-sudu-z-metoyu-zakhistu-interesiv-teritorialnoyi-gromadi-ye-nevidyemnim-pravom-organu-mistsevogo-samovryaduvannya [ukr.]
Postanova Verhovnogo Sudu vіd 21 listopada 2018 roku u spravі № 504/4148/16- a. URL: https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/78165785 [ukr.]
Postanova Verhovnogo Sudu vіd 11 chervnya 2019 roku u spravі № 820/2639/18. URL: https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/82406101 [ukr.]
Case of Association Burestop and others 55 v. France: decision of the European Court of Human Rights, 01.07.2021, № № 56176/18, 56189/18, 56232/18, 56236/18, 56241/18, 56247/18. URL: https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/rus#{%22itemid%22:[%22001-210768%22]} [engl.]