APPLICATION OF THE PROVISIONS OF PART 5 OF ARTICLE 615 OF THE CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CODE OF UKRAINE DURING CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS UNDER MARTIAL LAW: CERTAIN ASPECTS

APPLICATION OF THE PROVISIONS OF PART 5 OF ARTICLE 615 OF THE CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CODE OF UKRAINE DURING CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS UNDER MARTIAL LAW: CERTAIN ASPECTS

PDF

УДК 343

ORCID: 0000-0003-3394-1969

DOI 10.37566/2707-6849-2022-1-2(38-39)-1

Iryna SHAPOVALOVA,

judge of the Pavlohradskyi City-District Court of Dnipropetrovsk Oblast, the trainer of the National School of Judges of Ukraine, Ph.D. in Law.

APPLICATION OF THE PROVISIONS OF PART 5 OF ARTICLE 615 OF THE CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CODE OF UKRAINE DURING CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS UNDER MARTIAL LAW: CERTAIN ASPECTS

The article examines the issue of the practical implementation of the possibility of continuing the preventive measure chosen during the pre-trial investigation in the form of detention under martial law, which is connected with the application by the courts of the provisions of Part 5 of Article 615 of the Criminal Procedure Code of Ukraine. It has been proven that the presence of conceptual conditions defined by this norm of the criminal procedural law is necessary for the court to apply the provisions of Part 5 of Article 615 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine, which in turn cannot be evaluated abstractly and must be applied based on the court’s preliminary assessment of the impossibility of conducting a preliminary trial meeting. A systematic analysis of criminal procedural legislation indicates that the implementation of criminal proceedings under martial law, given the specifics of the regulatory regulation of this process, led to the establishment of special procedures, including the application of the norms of the Criminal Procedure Code of Ukraine as norms of direct action, however, given the novelty of the procedure, in the event that the intention of the legislator was different, all these provisions should be unified. It is emphasized that the grounds for applying the provisions of Part 5 of Article 615 of the Criminal Procedure Code of Ukraine must be set out in the court decision, with the definition of its mandatory elements, which allow the possibility to assess the correctness of the application of the provisions of Part 5 of Article 615 of the Criminal Procedure Code of Ukraine in the case of an earlier automatic extension selected preventive measure in the form of detention, in particular, regarding the impossibility of holding a preparatory court session; presence of a preventive measure in the form of detention selected during the pre-trial investigation; expiration of the decision on choosing a preventive measure in the form of detention. A mandatory element is also the establishment of the period for which the preventive measure is considered extended and which cannot exceed two months from the date of such resolution.

Key words: preventive measure in the form of detention, preparatory court session, martial law.

References

Kryminalnyi protsesualnyi kodeks Ukrainy: Zakon Ukrainy vid 13.04.2012 № 4651-VI. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/4651-17#Text [ukr.].

Hloviuk I., Drozdov O., Teteriatnyk H., Fomina T., Rohalska V., Zavtur V. Osoblyvyi rezhym dosudovoho rozsliduvannia, sudovoho rozghliadu v umovakh voiennoho stanu: naukovo-praktychnyi komentar Rozdilu IX-1 Kryminalnoho protsesualnoho kodeksu Ukrainy. Vydannia

Elektronne vydannia. DniproLviv-Odesa-Kharkiv, 2022. Stanom na 25 serpnia 2022. 78 s. [ukr.]. 3.Rishennia Konstytutsiinoho Sudu Ukrainy u spravi za konstytutsiinym podanniam Upovnovazhenoho Verkhovnoi Rady Ukrainy z prav liudyny shchodo vidpovidnosti Konstytutsii u spravi za konstytutsiinym podanniam Upovnovazhenoho Verkhovnoi Rady Ukrainy z prav liudyny shchodo vidpovidnosti Konstytutsii Ukrainy (konstytutsiinosti) polozhennia tretoho rechennia chastyny tretoi statti 315 Kryminalnoho protsesualnoho kodeksu Ukrainy vid 23.11.2017r. № 1-r/2017 URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/ show/v001p710-17#n63 [ukr.].

Rishennia YeSPL u spravi «Chaniev proty Ukrainy» vid 09.10.2014 r. № 46193/13. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/974_a37#Text [ukr.].

Rishennia YeSPL u spravi «Mamedova proty Rosii» vid 01.06.2006 r. № 7064/05. URL: http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/fre?i=002- 3261 [ukr.].

Rishennia YeSPL u spravi «Shyshkov proty Bolharii» vid 09.01.2003r № 38822/97. URL: http://hudoc.echr.coe.int [ukr.].

Konventsiia pro zakhyst prav liudyny i osnovopolozhnykh svobod: mizhnarodnyi dokument vid 04.11.1950 r. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/995_004#Text [ukr.].

Shchodo vzhyttia nevidkladnykh zakhodiv dlia zabezpechennia staloho funktsionuvannia sudovoi vlady v Ukrainy v umovakh prypynennia povnovazhen Vyshchoi rady pravosuddia ta voiennykh dii z boku Rosiiskoi Federatsii. Rishennia Rady suddiv vid 24.02.2022 r. № 9. URL: http://rsu.gov.ua/ua/documents/130 [ukr.].

Shchodo okremykh pytan zdiisnennia kryminalnoho provadzhennia v umovakh voiennoho stanu: lyst Verkhovnoho Sudu vid 03.03.2022 r. № 2/0/2-22. URL: https:// supreme.court.gov.ua/userfiles/media/new_folder_for_uploads/supreme/war/Inform_ lyst_2022_03_03.pdf?fbclid=IwAR34RkD0YPwwkA1xHS0hUmN2LJek8lzxUF02hUvk kD0lAWscgM2_mVcgPLA [ukr.].

Pro vnesennia zminy do chastyny somoi statti 147 Zakonu Ukrainy «Pro sudoustrii i status suddiv» shchodo vyznachennia terytorialnoi pidsudnosti sudovykh sprav Zakon Ukrainy vid 03.03.2022 r. № 2112-IX. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2112- 20#Text [ukr.].

Hubnytskyi D. Niuansy novoho zakonodavstva shchodo pytannia pro prodovzhennia zapobizhnoho zakhodu u vyhliadi trymannia pid vartoiu. Sudovo-yurydychna hazeta. 11.04.2022. URL: https://sud.ua/uk/news/blog/234575-nyuansi-novogo-zakonodavstvaschodo-pitannya-pro-prodovzhennya-zapobizhnogo-zakhodu-u-viglyadi-trimannya-pidvartoyu [ukr.].

Ukhvala Amur-Nyzhnodniprovskoho raionnoho sudu m.Dnipropetrovska vid 23 veresnia 2022 roku u spravi № 199/7046/22 ( provadzhennia № 1-kp/199/593/22). URL: https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/106399387 [ukr.].

Mykhailenko V. Evoliutsiia sudovoi praktyky u kryminalnomu provadzhenni v umovakh voiennoho stanu: zapobizhni zakhody. Yurydychna hazeta online. 03.05.2022. URL: https://yur-gazeta.com/publications/practice/sudova-praktika/evolyuciya-sudovoyipraktiki-u-kriminalnomu-provadzhenni-v-umovah-voennogo-stanu-zapobizhni-zahodi. html [ukr.].

Ukhvala Dniprovskoho apeliatsiinoho sudu vid 13.04.2022 roku (Sprava № 212/1817/22). URL: https://reestr.court.gov.ua/Review/103959190 [ukr.].

Pro poperednie uviaznennia: Zakon Ukrainy vid 30.06.1993 № 3352-XII. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/3352-12#n19 [ukr.].

Ukhvala Kasatsiinoho kryminalnoho sudu vid 21 lypnia 2022 roku u spravi № 761/22125/19 (provadzhennia № 51-1474sk20). URL: https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/ Review/105359442 [ukr.].

Fomina T., Rohalska V. Zapobizhni zakhody v umovakh voiennoho stanu: shcho zminylos. Zakon i biznes. 19.05.2022. URL: https://zib.com.ua/ua/151472-zapobizhni_ zahodi_v_umovah_voennogo_stanu_scho_zminilos.html [ukr.].

Rishennia YeSPL u spravi «Koeme ta inshi proty Belhiï2 № 32492/96, 32547/96, 32548/96, 33209/96, 33210/96 vid 18.10.2000 r. URL: https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/ rus?i=001-59194 [ukr.].

Rishennia YeSPL u spravi «Balatskyy̆ proty Ukraïny» № 34786/03 vid 25.10.2007 r. URL: https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/rus?i=001-171869 [ukr.].

Rishennia YeSPL u spravi «Morey̆ra Ferey̆ra proty Portuhaliï (№ 2)» [VP] № 19867/12 vid 11.07.2017 r. URL: https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/rus?i=001-175646 [ukr.].

Rishennia YeSPL u spravi «Hirvisaari proty Finliandii» (№ 49684/99 vid 27.09.2001 r. URL: http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/rus?i=001-59682 [ukr.].