PDF 

УДК 347.27:347.721

DOI 10.37566/2707-6849-2022-3-4(40-41)-11

ORCID: 0000-0003-1095-3481

Oleg PODTSERKOVNYI,

Doctor of Law, Professor, Head of the Chair of Economic Law and Procedure of the National University «Odessa Law Academy», Corresponding Member of the Ukrainian National Academy of Law Sciences

REGARDING SOLVING THE PROBLEMS OF FORCED FORECLOSURE ON THE DEBTOR'S SHARE IN A LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY

The article examines the problems of ensuring an effective mechanism for foreclosure on the debtor's share in a limited liability company. It has been established that the existing tools for overcoming conflicts in the case of the implementation of corporate rights of the debtor in the LLC do not meet the needs of executive proceedings. Taking into account the divisibility of the share, it is concluded that the preferential right to purchase the share applies to that part of the share that covers the amount of the debt, if the amount of debt of the partner of the partnership is less. than the value of the share determined in the foreclosure procedure. The possibility of converging the procedures of forced debt collection and forced withdrawal of a participant from a limited liability company has been identified. Based on this, it is proposed to establish a subsidiary procedure for the compulsory payment of the value of a share in a company by analogy with the relations regarding the exit of a participant from a company with certain features. Among these features is the emergence of the right to forced payment of the share only after the lack of effectiveness of the sale of the share in the enforcement proceedings, the need to shorten the terms of payment of the value of the share by establishing the obligation of the company to make the payment within a month after the end of the financial quarter in which the executor sent the company a demand for the distribution of the share participant This approach can make it possible to reduce the debtor's share in the company in proportion to the payment of the partner's debt by the company, without creating an additional financial burden on the company, as well as to stimulate other participants to early redemption of the debtor's share in order to prevent financial complications for joint business. It is also proposed to legislate that in the event that a participant (participants) does not exercise its preemptive right to purchase another participant's share, the participant's share is redeemed by the participant (participants) on a proportional basis without taking into account the share of the participant (participants) who waived the preemptive right.

Key words: executive proceedings, economic regulation, preemptive right, corporate rights, executor, debtor, foreclosure on a share in a limited liability company.

References

Shemeta T. Chastka v statutnomu kapitali tovarystva z obmezhenoyu vipovidalʹnistyu: ponyattya, pravova pryroda. Pidpryyemnytstvo, hospodarstvo i pravo. 2019. № 1. S. 55–60 [ukr.]

Kravchuk V. M. Prypynennya korporatyvnykh pravovidnosyn v hospodarsʹkykh tovarystvakh: dys. … d-ra yuryd. nauk: 12.00.03. Lʹviv, 2009. 430 s. [ukr.]

Soldatkin O. Zvernennya styahnennya na chastku u statutnomu kapitali TOV: problemni momenty zakonodavchoho rehulyuvannya: yur-gazeta.com 10 hrudnya 2019. URL: https://yur-gazeta.com/publications/practice/korporativne-pravo-ma/ zvernennya-styagnennya-na-chastku-u-statutnomu-kapitali-tov-problemni-momentizakonodavchogo-regulyu.html stanom na 21.12.2022 [ukr.]

Bilyavsʹkyy V. Chy mozhna zvernuty styahnennya na chastku uchasnyka tovarystva: afortiori.com.ua. URL: https://afortiori.com.ua/publikatsii/69-chi-mozhna-zvernutistyagnennya-na-chastku-uchasnika-tovaristva stanom na 21.12.2022 [ukr.]

Kyrychenko P. Problemni pytannya zvernennya styahnennya na korporatyvni prava borzhnyka. pv.net.ua stanom na 10.04.2018. URL: https://pv.net.ua/?p=280 [ukr.]

Rishennya Yevropeysʹkoho Sudu z prav lyudyny u spravi «Zhovner proty Ukrayiny» vid 29 chervnya 2004 r. Rishennya Yevropeysʹkoho Sudu z prav lyudyny shchodo Ukrayiny. Vyp. 1 / Kharkivsʹka pravozakhysna hrupa. Kharkiv: Prava lyudyny, 2006. S. 81–94 [ukr.]

Postanova Verkhovnyy Sud u skladi kolehiyi suddiv Kasatsiynoho hospodarsʹkoho sudu vid 14 chervnya 2022 roku u spravi № 904/4790/20 / Reyestr sudovykh rishenʹ. URL: https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/104747629 [ukr.]

Rishennya Konstytutsiynoho Sudu Ukrayiny u spravi za konstytutsiynym zvernennyam zakrytoho aktsionernoho tovarystva «Obolon» ta hromadyanyna Vynnyka Viktora Volodymyrovycha pro ofi tsiyne tlumachennya polozhenʹ chastyny druhoyi statti 28 Zakonu Ukrayiny «Pro hospodarsʹki tovarystva», punktu 1, abzatsu pershoho punktu 5 statti 4 Zakonu Ukrayiny «Pro vlasnist» (sprava pro prava aktsioneriv ZAT) 11 travnya 2005 roku № 4-rp/2005. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/v004p710-05#Text [ukr.]

Stepanchuk S. S., Kravtsova I. V. Osoblyvosti rehulyuvannya birzhovoho fondovoho rynku v Ukrayini. Ekonomika ta derzhava. 2010. № 2. S. 59 [ukr.]

Perepelʹchenko A. O. Osoblyvosti zvernennya styahnennya na chastku u spilʹnomu mayni. URL: https://prikhodko.com.ua/my-i-zmi/my-i-zmi/stattya/osoblivosti-zvernennyastyagnennya-na-chastku-u-spilnomu-majni/ [ukr.]