PDF 

УДК 342.7 (477)

ORCID: 0000-0002-7704-5093

ORCID: 0000-0003-2051-3172

DOI 10.37566/2707-6849-2022-3-4(40-41)-9

Yuriy ZADOROZHNY,

Associate Professor of Constitutional and Administrative Law National Transport University, PhD in Law, Associate Professor

Galina ZADOROZHNYA,

scientific consultant of the support department activities of the chairman and deputy chairman of the court secretariat Administrative Court of Cassation of the Supreme Court, Doctor of Law, Professor

JUDICIAL PROTECTION OF THE RIGHT TO PUBLIC DISCUSSION

The article summarizes the national judicial practice regarding the realization of the territorial community's right to public discussion, public hearing in the sphere of urban planning. It was found that the concepts of «public hearing» and «public discussion» are not identical and are related to each other as a part and a whole, which determines the diff erent functional authority of the territorial community in the process of their practical implementation. It has been established that the causes of disputes in the aspect of the implementation of the territorial community's right to public discussion, public hearing in the sphere of urban planning activities are: non-compliance with the legally established procedure by one of the parties to the court process, in particular, by the local self-government body, its officials or members of the territorial community; different interpretations of the content of legal documents, the subject of which are the legal regulation of such procedures; procedural multifaceted nature of the territorial community's right to public discussion, public hearing. Court practice shows that the institution of public hearings requires members of the territorial community not only to express their disagreement with the decision or draft decision of the local self-government body on certain issues in the sphere of urban development, but also to provide a legislative justification for their position, which proves that their legal rights and interests have been violated. in this legal relationship. In their decisions, national courts state the need for systematic compliance with a step-by-step algorithm for the procedural implementation of the territorial community's right to public discussion and public hearing in the sphere of urban planning.

Key words: territorial community, local self-government, public discussion, public hearing, urban planning activity.

References

Pro mistseve samovryaduvannya v Ukrayini: Zakon Ukrayiny vid 21 travnya 1997 r. № 280/97-VR // Ofi tsiynyy visnyk Ukrayiny. 1997 r. № 25. S. 20. Kod akta 1051/1997 [ukr.].

Pro rehulyuvannya mistobudivnoyi diyalʹnosti: Zakon Ukrayiny vid 17 lyutoho 2011 r. № 3038-VI. URL:https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/3038-17#Text38-VI [ukr.].

Slovnyk ukrayinsʹkoyi movy: v 11 t. T. 9 / red. I. S. Nazarova ta in. Kyyiv: Nauk. dumka, 1978. 916 s. [ukr.].

Slovnyk ukrayinsʹkoyi movy: v 11 t. T. 5 / red. V. O. Vynnyk, L. A. Yurchuk. Kyyiv: Nauk. dumka, 1974. 840 s. [ukr.].

Poryadok provedennya hromadsʹkykh slukhanʹ shchodo proektiv mistobudivnoyi dokumentatsiyi na mistsevomu rivni: Postanova Kabinetu Ministriv Ukrayiny vid 25 travnya 2011 r. № 555 // Ofi tsiynyy visnyk Ukrayiny. 2011. № 41. S. 45. St. 1669. Kod akta 56804/2011 [ukr.].

Poryadok provedennya hromadsʹkykh slukhanʹ u protsesi otsinky vplyvu nadovkillya: Postanova Kabinetu Ministriv Ukrayiny vid 13 hrudnya 2017 r. № 989 // Ofi tsiynyy visnyk Ukrayiny. 2018. № 2. S. 200. St. 54. Kod akta 88527/201 [ukr.].

Shaptala N. K., Zadorozhnya H. V. Konstytutsiyne pravo Ukrayiny: navch. posib. Zaporizhzhya: Dyke pole, 2012. 480 s. [ukr.].

Statut terytorialʹnoyi hromady mista Kyyeva, zatverdzhenyy Rishennyam Kyyivsʹkoyi misʹkoyi rady vid 28 bereznya 2002 r. № 371/1805. URL: https://kmr.gov.ua/uk/content/ status-terytorialnoyi-gromady-mista-kyyeva [ukr.].

Pro hromadsʹki slukhannya: proyekt Zakonu Ukrayiny (reyestr. № 2295a vid 06. 07. 2015). URL: https://ips.ligazakon.net/document/XH1RR68A [ukr.]

Postanova Verkhovnoho Sudu vid 15 kvitnya 2020 r. u spravi № 702/1384/16-a. URL: https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/88814577 [ukr.].

Postanova Verkhovnoho Sudu vid 03 hrudnya 2021 r. u spravi № 369/7844/17 (administratyvne provadzhennya № K/9901/60445/18). URL: https://reyestr.court.gov. ua/Review/101608754 [ukr.].

Postanova Verkhovnoho Sudu vid 19 lyutoho 2019 roku № 461/4009/15-a (administratyvne provadzhennya № K/9901/7480/18, K/9901/7479/18). URL: https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/80036796 [ukr.].

Postanova Verkhovnoho Sudu vid 13 kvitnya 2020 r. u spravi № 803/1254/17 (provadzhennya № K/9901/50488/18). URL: https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review /88728244 [ukr.].

Postanova Verkhovnoho Sudu vid 01 zhovtnya 2019 r. u spravi № 810/4017/17 (administratyvne provadzhennya № K/9901/16248/19), punkty 39, 41, 42, 48. URL: https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/84676436 [ukr.].

Postanova Verkhovnoho Sudu vid 23 veresnya 2021 r. u spravi № 1.380.2019.001380 (administratyvne provadzhennya № K/9901/8042/20), punkt 28. URL: https://reyestr. court.gov.ua/Review/99836084 [ukr.].

Postanova Verkhovnoho Sudu vid 14 lystopada 2019 r. u spravi № 0740/885/18 (administratyvne provadzhennya № K/9901/20334/19, № K/9901/22935/19), punkty 83, 84, 97. URL: https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/85678920 [ukr.].

Postanova Verkhovnoho Sudu vid 27 veresnya 2022 r. u spravi № 320/1510/20 (administratyvne provadzhennya № K/9901/47532/21), punkty 25 – 29. URL: https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/106545430 [ukr.].

Rishennya Konstytutsiynoho Sudu Ukrayiny vid 1 hrudnya 2004 r. № 18-rp/2004. URL: https://ccu.gov.ua/docs/511 [ukr.].

Postanova Verkhovnoho Sudu vid 20 lyutoho 2019 r. u spravi №522/3665/17 (administratyvne provadzhennya № K/9901/38991/18), punkt 70. URL: https://reyestr. court.gov.ua/Review/85678920 [ukr.].

Postanova Verkhovnoho Sudu vid 04 veresnya 2019 r. u spravi № 826/13852/17 (administratyvne provadzhennya № K/9901/59758/18), punkty 67, 69. URL: https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/84134366 [ukr.].