УДК 344.2

DOI 10.37566/2707-6849-2024-1(46)-1

PDF

Natalia ANTONIUK,

Deputy Chairman of the Criminal Court of Cassation as part of the Supreme Court, secretary of the First Judicial Chamber, candidate of legal sciences, associate professor

Anatoliy MIROSHNYCHENKO

assistant to the commander of the military unit for legal work, member of the Interdepartmental Working Group at the Office of the  General Prosecutor on the study of problematic issues related to the investigation of violations of the laws and customs of war, doctor of legal sciences, professor

PROBLEMATIC ISSUES OF COMMANDERS' RESPONSIBILITY FOR WAR CRIMES.

This article examines the issue of criminal liability of enemy commanders for war crimes.

Two possible instances of commanders' participation in the commission of war crimes are identified: 1) direct commission of a war crime; 2) omission of the commander who did not directly commit a war crime, did not give orders to his subordinates to perform certain actions. The second instance is covered by the term «command responsibility», which extends to the commander's responsibility for omission.

Under command responsibility a commander must be held responsible for failure to exercise proper control over subordinate forces, provided that he knew or should have known of the commission of criminal acts by his subordinates and did not take all necessary and reasonable measures within his authority to prevent or stop them committing.

It is argued that the inaction of the commanders, who do not stop serious violations of the laws and customs of war provided for by international humanitarian law, is in itself a «violation of the laws and customs of war provided for by international treaties, ratified by the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine», in the context of Art. 438 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine.

Key words: criminal law, war crimes, commanders’ responsibility, command responsibility.

References

Antoniuk N. O. Differentiation of criminal responsibility in the criminal law of Ukraine: monograph. Kyiv: Alerta, 2023. 554 p. [ukr.].

Pashkovskyi M. І. Command responsibility for russian commanders based on article  438 of the criminal code of ukraine and articles 86, 87 of the first additional Protocol to the Geneva conventions: prospects for using the croatian experience // Wloclawek, Republic of Poland May 29–30, 2023. International scientific conference. P. 107–110. URL:http://baltijapublishing.lv/omp/index.php/bp/catalog/download/340/9362/19524-1?inline=1[ukr.]

Kolotukha I. Features of responsibility of commanders during the war. Analytical and Comparative Jurisprudence. An electronic scientific professional journal, 2022, №  6.P. 328–332. URL: https://app-journal.in.ua/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/62.pdf [ukr.]

Database of the International Committee of the Red Cross. Customary international humanitarian law. URL: https://www.icrc.org/en/doc/assets/files/other/ukr-irrc_857_henckaerts.pdf [ukr.]

The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/995_588#Text [ukr.].

Additional Protocol to the Geneva Conventions of August 12, 1949, Concerning the Protection of Victims of International Armed Conflicts (Protocol I), dated June 8, 1977 /Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/995_199#Text [ukr.]

Milanković v. Croatia (application no. 33351/20). URL: https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/fre#{%22itemid%22:[%22001-215180%22]}

 Yakovlev A., Tymochko M., Rudenko V. Commander responsibility behind the scenes of the Criminal Code. URL: https://justtalk.com.ua/post/komandna-vidpovidalnist-zalashtunkami-kriminalnogo-kodeksu [ukr.]