УДК 343.9

ORCID: 0000-0003-1816-7426

DOI 10.37566/2707-6849-2024-4(49)-9

PDF

Iryna ZAVYDІNAK

Head of the Department of Criminal Law, Procedure and Criminalistics

Academy of Labor, Social Relations and Tourism, 

Candidate of Law, Associate Professor

USING SPECIALIZED KNOWLEDGE IN THE PROCESS OF INVESTIGATING CRIMINAL OFFENSES IN THE FIELD OF OFFICIAL ACTIVITIES.

The article is devoted to the analysis of the forms of using special knowledge in the process of pre-trial investigation of criminal offenses in the field of official activity and the features of their application in practical activity. The attention is focused on the problematic issues related to the involvement of a specialist in participating in investigative (search) actions in the investigation of official criminal offenses, and ways of their solution are outlined.

The criminal procedural legislation of Ukraine provides for procedural and non-procedural forms of using special knowledge in the process of pre-trial investigation of criminal proceedings. It is emphasized that the use of special knowledge is possible only after entering information about the criminal offense into the Unified Register of Pre-Trial Investigations.

In turn, the procedural form of using special expertise includes the appointment of expertise and the involvement of specialists in participating in investigative (search) actions in order to assist in the identification, fixation and seizure of objects and documents, clarification of other issues of a special nature, and the non-procedural form of using special knowledge includes the advisory and reference work of a competent person in certain fields of knowledge and technical assistance of such a person.

It is emphasized that the qualification of the involved specialist plays a rather important role, because the person conducting the investigation may involve such a specialist as an auditor or a certified expert in the conduct of the investigative (search) action, or may simply involve a person with a higher economic education who has a certain work experience and skills in the necessary field. Given this, even before the start of the investigative (search) action, the investigator must resolve the issue of the qualification and level of knowledge of the specialist.

It has been determined that effective and rapid resolution of criminal proceedings is possible only in the case of a tactically correct complex combination of procedural and non-procedural forms of using special knowledge, since they are interdependent and complement each other.

Key words: criminal offenses in the field of official activity, special knowledge, investigative (search) actions, specialist, specialist conclusion, procedural form, non-procedural form, pre-trial investigation.

References

Bidnyak H. S. Teoriya i praktyka vykorystannya spetsialʹnykh znanʹ pry rozsliduvanni shakhraystv: monohraf. Dnipro: Dniprop. derzh. un-t vnutr. sprav, 2019. 152 р.

Zavydnyak I. O. Uchastʹ spetsialista u provedenni slidchykh diy ta yoho konsulʹtatyvna dopomoha. Elektronne naukove fakhove vydannya «Porivnyalʹno-analitychne pravo». 2019. № 6. р. 453–456.

Klymenko N. I. Zminy v pravovomu rehulyuvanni sudovo-ekspertnoyi diyalʹnosti. Kryminalistychnyy visnyk. 2005. № 1. р. р. 56–60.

Shepitko V. YU. Dovidnyk slidchoho. Vyd. 4-te, pererobl. i dop. Kharkiv: Odisey, 2013. 232 р.

Honcharenko V. H., Kurdyukov V. V., Lehkykh K. V. Spetsialʹni znannya: henezys, predmet, rivni, formy vykorystannya v dokazuvanni. Visnyk Akademiyi advokatury Ukrayiny. 2007. № 2 (9). р. р. 22–34.

Romanyuk B. V. Suchasni teoretychni ta pravovi problemy vykorystannya spetsialʹnykh znanʹ u dosudovomu slidstvi: avtoref. dys. na zdobuttya nauk. stupenya kand. yuryd. nauk: spets. 12.00.09. Kyiv: NAVSU, 2002. 22 р.

Hora I. V. Problemy vykorystannya spetsialʹnykh znanʹ u kryminalʹnomu sudochynstvi Ukrayiny. Yurydychnyy chasopys Natsionalʹnoyi akademiyi vnutrishnikh sprav. 2013. № 1. Р. 208–214.

Marushev A. D. Konsulʹtatsiya yak odna z form vykorystannya spetsialʹnykh znanʹ u kryminalʹnomu provadzhenni. Yurydychnyy naukovyy elektronnyy zhurnal. 2020. № 4. р. р. 307–310.

Lazebnyy A. M. Zaluchennya spetsialista dlya provedennya okremykh slidchykh rozshukovykh diy. Naukovyy visnyk Natsionalʹnoho universytetu DPS Ukrayiny (ekonomika, pravo). Irpinʹ, 2014. Vyp. 2(65). р. р. 187–193.

Starushkevych A. M. Kryminalistychne profilyuvannya: naukove obgruntuvannya ta problemy vykorystannya u rozsliduvanni zlochyniv. Pravo Ukrayiny. 2004. № 8. Р. 64–68.

Moyisyeyev O. M. Zaluchennya spetsialista do rozsliduvannya kompʺyuternykh zlochyniv. Materialy naukovo-praktychnoyi konferentsiyi. Donetsʹk: Donetsʹkyy instytut vnutrishnikh sprav, 2001. Р. 81–85.

Yevdokimenko S. V. Formy vykorystannya spetsialʹnykh ekonomichnykh znanʹ u kryminalʹnomu provadzhenni ta sudochynstvi. Visnyk Chernivetsʹkoho fakulʹtetu Natsionalʹnoho universytetu «Odesʹka yurydychna akademiya». 2016. № 2. Р. 372–384.

Osoblyvosti provedennia nehlasnykh slidchykh (rozshukovykh) dii pid chas dosudovoho rozsliduvannia kryminalnykh provadzhen / Vebsait Kvalifikatsiino-dystsyplinarnoi komisii advokatury Kyivskoi oblasti. URL: http://kdkako.com.ua/osoblivosti-provedennya-neglasnih-slidchih-rozshukovih-diy-pid-chas-dosudovogo-rozsliduvannya/