CRIMINAL LEGAL POLICY IN THE SPHERE OF SECURITY MEASURES: CONCEPTS AND WAYS OF IMPROVEMENT

PDF

Victoria SHPILYAREVIC,

Lecturer, Department of Criminal Law, Vasyl Stefanyk Precarpathian National University, Candidate of Law

CRIMINAL LEGAL POLICY IN THE SPHERE OF SECURITY MEASURES: CONCEPTS AND WAYS OF IMPROVEMENT

 

The article examines the definition of criminal legal policy in the sphere of applying security measures as part of the criminal legal policy of Ukraine and ways of its improvement. In particular, the author draws attention to the content side (the subject) of criminal legal policy in the sphere of implementation of security measures, which is defined by the tasks, which are standing towards it. In its turn, the tasks of examined side of penal policy in the sphere of applying of security measures, defined by the goals assigned to it, which can be divided into material and legal.

Considering the sources of penal policy in the field of implementation of security measures, the author states that in addition to the sources that are typical for the penal policy of Ukraine, it is necessary to define one more source that has not been analyzed by scientists before. This source are the decisions of the European Court of Human Rights, especially those where Ukraine was a side of the case.

To the improvement of penal policy of Ukraine in the field of security measures, the author considers the necessary of implementation to the criminal legislation of Ukraine some essential changes and amendments in order to implement the institute of security measures. The changes and amendments should be the harmonization between the articles of criminal legislation of Ukraine. This efforts should made the proper implementation of the measures stated above on legal practice.

As a conclusion the author emphasizes that modern penal policy in the sphere of security measures characterized by the following features: a) the humanization of the institute of security measures and its practical implementation; b) the democratization of security measures as one form of criminal legal measures aimed to counteract at crime; c) the provision of law and social justice in the implementation of the institute of security measures; d) the approval of the judiciary system, increasing the independence and role of the courts, as the only body authorized to decide about the implementation of a measure of security; e) the use of universal human values and the achievements of world civilization in criminal procedure, as a result of implementation of security measures.

Key words: criminal legal policy of Ukraine, penal policy in the field of security measures, security measures, the European Court of Human Rights, compulsory medical measures, compulsory treatment.

 

References

Borisov V. I. Modern state policy in the field of crime control and its criminal law direction. Law of Ukraine. 2012. No 1–2. Pp. 232–242.[ukr.]

Borisov V. I., Fries P. L. The concept of criminal law policy. Bulletin of the Association of Criminal Law of Ukraine. 2013. No 1 (1). Pp. 15–31. [ukr.]

Shpilyarevich V. V.  Criminal and legal security measures: auto-ref. dis. for science. degree of Cand. jurid. Science: special. 12.00.08 - criminal law and criminology; criminal executive law. Lviv, 2015. 20 p. [ukr.]

About the Prosecutor's Office: Law of Ukraine of October 14, 2014 No. 1697-VII. Information of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine. 2015. No 2–3. p. 54. Art. 12. [ukr.]

Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms of November 4, 1950. Official Gazette of Ukraine. 1998. No 13. 2006. No 32. p. 270. [ukr.]

On the implementation of decisions and application of the case law of the European Court of Human Rights: Law of Ukraine of February 23, 2006 No. 3477-IV. Information of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine. 2006. No 30. S. 1114. p. 260. [ukr.]

Judgment of the European Court of Human Rights of 8 November 2005 in the case of Gorshkov v. Ukraine. URL: http // zakon4.rada.gov.ua / laws / show / 974_090. [ukr.]

Judgment of the European Court of Human Rights of 6 September 2007 in the case of Kucheruk v. Ukraine. URL: http://zakon4.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/974_839. [ukr.]

Judgment of the European Court of Human Rights of 28 March 2006 in Melnik v. Ukraine. URL: http://zakon4.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/974_037. [ukr.]

Judgment of the European Court of Human Rights of 25 October 2007 in the case of Yakovenko v. Ukraine. URL: http://zakon4.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/974_438. [ukr.]

Universal Declaration of Human Rights of December 10, 1948 / Doc. UN / PES / 217 A. Human rights: international treaties of Ukraine, declarations, documents. K., 1992. p. 18–24. [ukr.]

UN Convention on the Rights of the Child of November 20, 1989, ratified by Resolution of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine of February 27, 2001 No. 789-XII. Information of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine. 1991. No 13. P. 145. [ukr.]

On civil and political rights: the international pact of the UN General Assembly of December 16, 1966. Human rights: international treaties of Ukraine, declarations, documents. K., 1992. P. 36–62. [ukr.]