ACHIEVEMENTS AND PROSPECTS OF COMMERCIAL COURTS OF UKRAINE IN ESTABLISHING THE RULE OF LAW

ACHIEVEMENTS AND PROSPECTS OF COMMERCIAL COURTS OF UKRAINE IN ESTABLISHING THE RULE OF LAW

PDF 

УДК 346.9

DOI 10.37566/2707-6849-2021-3(36)-10

 

Taras RYM,

Judge of the Commercial Court of Lviv Region,

Doctor of Laws

 

Achievements and prospects of commercial courts of Ukraine in establishing the rule of law

The article is devoted to analyzing the application of the principle of the rule of law by commercial courts. The author cites the main legal acts that laid the foundation for the application by courts of the rule of law and analyzes Ukrainian scholars' work in this area. He substantiates that applying the European Court of Human Rights practice is a difficult task. It requires in-depth knowledge of both the European Convention on Human Rights itself and the principles of its interpretation. The National School of Judges plays an essential role in introducing the rule of law into national judicial practice.

The author notes that the concept of justice primarily concerns fair judicial protection procedures. No court decision can be considered just if it does not comply with legal requirements.

Based on individual decisions of the European Court of Human Rights, decisions of national commercial courts, the author demonstrates a change in the approach of commercial courts to dispute resolution. Particular attention is paid to legal certainty and res judicata principle. The author analyzes the right of the Grand Chamber of the Supreme Court to derogate from previous legal positions as an element of the principle of legal certainty, justifies the reasons for frequent deviations. Finally, the article provides specific lawsuits to confirm the results.

The author paid particular attention to the problem of long-term non-execution of court decisions, which essentially undermines the rule of law.

Attention is also paid to the shortcomings of the use of ECtHR case law by courts in national case law.

Keywords: the rule of law, commercial court, legal certainty.

 

 

References

Pro pryiednannia Ukrainy do Statutu Rady Yevropy: Zakon Ukrainy vid 31.10.1995 № 398/95-VR [the Law of Ukraine On Ukraine’s Accession to the Statute of the Council of Europe]. URL: // https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/398/95-vr#Text [ukr.]

Bezklubyi I., Lukisha K. Verkhovenstvo prava yak pryntsyp suchasnoho pravoporiadku. Pro ukrainske pravo [The rule of law as a principle of modern law and order. About Ukrainian law] / Za red. prof. I. Bezkluboho. Kyiv, 2013. Chyslo VI-VII. 367 p. [ukr.]

Iudkivska H. Sutinky prav liudyny i Yevropeiskyi sud [Twilight of human rights and the European Court]. URL: https://racurs.ua/ua/1136-prava-ganna-udkivska.html. [ukr.]

Rabinovych P. M. Prava liudyny i hromadianyna u Konstytutsii Ukrainy: do interpretatsii vykhidnykh konstytutsiinykh polozhen [Human and civil rights in the Constitution of Ukraine: the interpretation of the original constitutional provisions]. Kharkiv: Pravo, 1997. 64p. [ukr.]

Rabinovych P. M. Prava liudyny i hromadianyna: problemy realizatsii v Ukraini [Human and civil rights: problems of implementation in Ukraine]. Pratsi Lvivskoi laboratorii prav liudyny Akademii pravovykh nauk Ukrainy; APN Ukrainy. Kyiv: In-Yure, 1998. P. 21–49. [ukr.]

Konstytutsiia Ukrainy: Zakon Ukrainy vid 28.06.1996 [Constitution of Ukraine]. Data onovlennia: 01.01.2020. Data onovlennia: 01.01.2020. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/254%D0%BA/96-%D0%B2%D1%80#Text[ukr.]

Pro ratyfikatsiiu Konventsii pro zakhyst prav liudyny i osnovopolozhnykh svobod 1950 roku, Pershoho protokolu ta protokoliv № 2, 4, 7 ta 11 do Konventsii: Zakon Ukrainy vid 17.07.1997 № 475/97-VR [the Law of Ukraine On Ratification of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms of 1950, the First Protocol and Protocols № 2, 4, 7 and 11 to the Convention]. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/475/97-vr#Text[ukr.]

Pro vykonannia rishen ta zastosuvannia praktyky Yevropeiskoho sudu z prav liudyny: Zakon Ukrainy vid 23.02.2006 № 3477-IV [the Law of Ukraine On the Fulfillment of Decisions and Application of Practice of the European Court of Human Rights]. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/3477-15#Text[ukr.]

Onishchuk M. Innovatsii suddivskoi osvity v Ukraini: stratehiia rozvytku na 2021-2025 roky [Innovations in judicial education in Ukraine: development strategy for 2021-2025]. Slovo natsionalnoi shkoly suddiv Ukrainy. 2020. № 4 (33). P. 6-16. [ukr.]

Koziubra M. I. Prava i svobody liudyny i hromadianyna v umovakh stanovlennia pravovoi derzhavy v Ukraini. Prava hromadian u sferi vykonavchoi vlady: administratyvno-pravove zabezpechennia realizatsii ta zakhystu [Human and civil rights and freedoms in the conditions of formation of the legal state in Ukraine. Citizens' rights in the sphere of executive power: administrative and legal support of implementation and protection] / kol. avt., za zah. red. V.B. Averianova. Kyiv, 2007. P. 20-21.

Pro vnesennia zmin do Hospodarskoho protsesualnoho kodeksu Ukrainy, Tsyvilnoho protsesualnoho kodeksu Ukrainy, Kodeksu administratyvnoho sudochynstva Ukrainy ta inshykh zakonodavchykh aktiv: Zakon Ukrainy vid 03.10.2017 № 2147-VIII [the Law of Ukraine On amendments to the Commercial Procedural Code of Ukraine, the Civil Procedure Code of Ukraine, the Code of Administrative Procedure of Ukraine and other legislative acts]. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2147a-19#n2 [ukr.]

Verkhovenstvo prava: Dopovid Yevropeiskoi Komisii «Za demokratiiu cherez verkhovenstvo prava», skhvalena na 86-mu plenarnomu zasidanni 25-26 bereznia 2011 roku [On the rule of law: report of european commission for democracy through law (Venice commission), adopted at 86th plenary session, 25-26 march 2011]. Pravo Ukrainy. 2011. № 10. P. 168-184. [ukr.]

Futei B. Konstytutsiina reforma i verkhovenstvo prava [Constitutional reform and the rule of law]. Stratehichni priorytety. 2008. № 2 (7). P.194-198. [ukr.]

Serkov v. Ukraine, no. 39766/05, 07 October 2011. URL: https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/ukr#{%22fulltext%22:[%22\%22CASE%20OF%20SERKOV%20v.%20UKRAINE\%22%22],%22documentcollectionid2%22:[%22GRANDCHAMBER%22,%22CHAMBER%22],%22itemid%22:[%22001-105536%22]}[ukr.]

Postanova Velykoi Palaty Verkhovnoho Sudu vid 22.06.2021 № 334/3161/17 [decision of the Grand Chamber of the Supreme Court]. URL: https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/98483113[ukr.]

Pro sudoustrii i status suddiv: Zakon Ukrainy vid 02.06.2016 № 1402-VIII [the Law of Ukraine On the judiciary and the status of judges]. Data onovlennia: 05.08.2021. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/1402-19#Text[ukr.]

Shumylo M. Pravovi vysnovky kasatsiinoho sudu: inter praeterium et futurum [Legal conclusions of the Court of Cassation: inter praeterium et futurum]. Pidpryiemnytstvo, hospodarstvo i pravo. 2020. № 12. P. 47-54. [ukr.]

Ustimenko v. Ukraine, no. 32053/13, 29 January 2016. URL: https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng#{%22itemid%22:[%22001-192500%22]}[ukr.]

Zheltyakov v. Ukraine, no. 4994/04, 09 September 2011. URL: https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng#{%22fulltext%22:[%224994/04%22],%22documentcollectionid2%22:[%22GRANDCHAMBER%22,%22CHAMBER%22],%22itemid%22:[%22001-104903%22]}[ukr.]

Brumarescu v. Romania, no. 28342/95, 28 November 1999. URL: http://eurocourt.in.ua/Article.asp?AIdx=307[ukr.]

Ukhvala Hospodarskoho sudu Lvivskoi oblasti vid 13.12.2017 № 914/3817/15. URL: https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/71068167[ukr.]

Ryabykh v. Russia, no. 52854/99, 24 July 2003. URL: http://www.echr.ru/documents/doc/new/003.htm [ukr.]

East/West Alliance Limited v. Ukraine, no. 19336/04, 23 January 2014. URL: https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng#{%22itemid%22:[%22001-171829%22]}[ukr.]

95% skarh do YeSPL vid ukraintsiv stosuiutsia nevykonannia sudovykh rishen – Zakharov [95% of complaints to the ECHR from Ukrainians concern non-enforcement of court decisions – Zakharov]. URL: https://www.radiosvoboda.org/a/devianosto-piat-vidsotkiv-skarg-do-yevrosudu-vid-ukrainsiv-stosuyutsia-nevykonannia-sudovyh-rishen/30962110.html[ukr.]

Yuriy Nikolayevich Ivanov v. Ukraine, no. 40450/04, 15 October 2009. URL: https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng#{%22itemid%22:[%22001-204728%22]} [engl.]

Burmych and others v. Ukraine, no. 46852/13, 12 October 2017. URL: https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng#{%22itemid%22:[%22001-192193%22]}[engl.]

Pushkar P. V. Vykonannia rishen Yevropeiskoho sudu z prav liudyny shchodo Ukrainy: osnovni systemno-strukturni problemy ta nevykonannia natsionalnykh sudovykh rishen, postanovlenykh proty derzhavy [Enforcement of decisions of the European Court of Human Rights against Ukraine: main systemic and structural problems and non-enforcement of national judgments against the state]. Ukrainskyi chasopys mizhnarodnoho prava. 2019. № 1. P. 79-108. [ukr.]

Stretch v. The United Kingdom, no. 44277/98, 24 June 2003. URL: https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng#{%22itemid%22:[%22001-117564%22]}[engl.]

Miroshnychenko A. Znachennia rishennia Yevropeiskoho sudu z prav liudyny u spravi «Stretch proty Spoluchenoho Korolivstva» dlia otsinky pravovykh naslidkiv porushennia protsedury vidchuzhennia derzhavnykh ta komunalnykh zemel [The significance of the decision of the European Court of Human Rights in the case «Stretch v. The United Kingdom» for the assessment of the legal consequences of the violation of the procedure of alienation of state and communal lands]. Pravo Ukrainy. 2016. № 1. P. 55-62. [ukr.]

Romaniuk Y. M. Vtruchannia v pravo vlasnosti z tochky zoru yoho vidpovidnosti statti 1 Pershoho protokolu do Konventsii pro zakhyst prav liudyny i osnovopolozhnykh svobod: kryterii Yevropeiskoho sudu z prav liudyny ta dosvid Ukrainy na okremykh prykladakh sudovoi praktyky [Interference with property rights in terms of its compliance with Article 1 of the First Protocol to the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms: criteria of the European Court of Human Rights and Ukraine's experience in selected case law]. Pravo vlasnosti: yevropeiskyi dosvid ta ukrainski realii: zbirnyk dopovidei i materialiv Mizhnarodnoi konferentsii, Kyiv, 22–23 zhovtnia 2015 roku. Kyiv: VAITE, 2015. P. 7-23. [ukr.]

Lavents v. Latvia, no. 58442/00, 28 November 2002. URL: https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng#{%22itemid%22:[%22001-183450%22]}[engl.]