УДК 342.951:614.46                                                                                                                                                                                              PDF

ORCID:0000-0002-0446-3892

DOI 10.37566/2707-6849-2020-3(32)-5

Mykola SAMBOR,

Head, the monitoring sector Pryluky police department Main Directorate of the National Police in Chernihiv region, Candidate of Law, Corresponding Member National Academy of Sciences of Higher Education of Ukraine

FEATURES OF DOCUMENTING AN ADMINISTRATIVE OFFENSE IN THE FIELD OF VIOLATION OF HUMAN QUARANTINE RULES

The article examines legal, organizational aspects of documenting administrative offenses for violating the rules of quarantine of people. The decisions of the courts of  Ukraine are studied, in which the evidence is examined from different angles, the question of their belonging, admissibility and sufficiency is studied. Based on the analysis of law enforcement practice of judicial bodies, the generalization of fundamental legal positions of courts aimed at observance of the principles of the rule of law and observance of human rights and freedoms has been carried out. Conclusions are made about the peculiarities of the use of sources of evidence when documenting violations of human quarantine rules. It is proposed to supplement the Code of Ukraine on Administrative Offenses with a number of articles that would contain procedural norms aimed at regulating the procedure and rules for collecting evidence on violations of human quarantine rules.

Approval of the legality of the actions of authorized officials who have been authorized by the state to draw up reports on administrative offenses and to bring persons to administrative responsibility under Art. 44³ CUAO it is necessary to supplement CUAO with articles of Art. 251¹ CUAO “Belonging of evidences”, Art. 251² of the Code of Administrative Offenses “Admissibility of evidence”, Art. 251³ CUAO “Reliability of evidences”, Art. 251⁴ of the Code of Administrative Offenses “Sufficiency of evidence”, Art. 251⁵ CUAO “Obligation of evidence”. Art. 251⁶ CUAO “Collection of evidence”. These additions to the Code of Administrative Offenses will allow to a theory of evidence in cases of administrative offenses.

Keywords:documentation, administrative offense, violation of human quarantine rules, affiliation, admissibility, sufficiency, reliability of evidence, collection of evidence.

References

Petrichenko S. A. (2015). The procedure for registration of procedural documents by officials of the State Border Guard Service of Ukraine. Naukovyi visnyk Khersonskoho derzhavnoho universytetu. Seriia Yurydychni nauky, Vypusk 5, Tom 3, 36–40 [ukr.].

Zavalnyi M. V. (2009). Initiation of a case on an administrative offense and its investigation. Universytetski naukovi zapysky, 4 (32), 160–165 [ukr.].

Kuzmenko O. V, Plugatyr M. V., Pastukh I. D (2016). Administrative liability and proceedings in cases of administrative offenses. Kuiv: Tsentr uchbovoi literatury [ukr.].

Sambor M. A. (2015). Proceedings in the case of an administrative offense: views on the concept. Visnyk Dnipropetrovskoho universytetu imeni Alfreda Nobelia. Seriia «Yurydychni nauky», 1(6),p.p. 128–134 [ukr.].

Sambor  M. A. (2014). Peculiarities of the organization of proceedings on the facts of committing administrative offenses in order to exclude events that entail criminal liability in accordance with the law. Naukovi zapysky Instytutu zakonodavstva Verkhovnoi rady Ukrainy, 1,p.p.59–65 [ukr.].

Sambor  M. A. (2015). Contents of the protocol on administrative offense: some problems of the law of applicable practice related to the adoption of procedural decisions.  Naukovi zapysky Instytutu zakonodavstva Verkhovnoi rady Ukrainy, 4, p. p.38–45 [ukr.].

Shevchuk  S. (2008). European concept of "established case law" and its impact on the law-making function of the Constitutional Court of Ukraine. Visnyk Konstytutsiinoho Sudu Ukrainy, 2, p. p. 93–101 [ukr.].

Sambor  M. (2018). Legal position in the Ukrainian legal doctrine. Visnyk Kyivskoho natsionalnoho universytetu imeni Tarasa Shevchenka. Yurydychni nauky, 107, p. p.80–84 [ukr.].

What does it mean to prove the guilt of a person beyond a reasonable doubt, explained the Supreme Court. Zakon i biznes. URL: https://zib.com.ua/ua/142525-scho_oznachae_dovedenist_vini_osobi_poza_rozumnim_sumnivom_r.html. (accased: 18.06.2020) [ukr.].

Resolution of the Supreme Court in the composition of the panel of judges of the Administrative Court of Cassation of July 8, 2020 in the case №К/9901/21241/18. URL: http://www.reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/90264746?fbclid=IwAR20XcAIBTwa-HEJ8NXdAFVtLDesWMwPm45gH6lAx2NTSpLiamYCGox7Vjg (accased:13.07.2020) [ukr.].

Judgment of the Supreme Court of 29 April 2020 in the case №161/5372/17 (administrative proceedings №К/9901/34016/18). URL: http://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/88986779?fbclid=IwAR3LD_axLQrF2uuMCnDmgzyIoMqKVLrBPLamyzKbi1h2OcyHykxSYHqCigw (accased:07.05.2020).[ ukr.]

Resolution of the Supreme Court in the composition of the panel of judges of the Administrative Court of Cassation of 20 May 2020 in the case № К/9901/33786/18. URL: http://www.reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/89325656?fbclid=IwAR2iflxESZiPBB88y04yEeSLV3HjdBK0nPz0EB-40etcHiadgqj-4xxiTyA. (accased:22.06.2020) [ukr.].

Sambor M. (2008). Peculiarities of proceedings and bringing to administrative responsibility in cases of administrative offenses (Articles 176, 178 of the Code of Administrative Offenses). Pravo Ukrainy, 5, p. p.122–128 [ukr.].

Resolution of the Pryluky City District Court of the Chernihiv Region of May 26, 2020, in the case № 742/812/20. URL:  http://www.reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/89696613. (accased:17.06.2020) [ukr.].

Resolution of the Kramatorsk City Court of the Donetsk Region of April 1, 2020 in the case № 234/5552/20. URL: http://www.reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/88531787. (accased:17.06.2020) [ukr.].

Resolution of the Sumy District Court of Sumy region of March 31, 2020 in the case № 587/572/20. URL: http://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/88520190 (accased:14.07.2020) [ukr.].

Resolution of the Supreme Court in the panel of judges of the Administrative Court of Cassation of November 15, 2018 in the case № 524/5536/17. URL: http://www.reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/77860158. (accased:22.06.2020) [ukr.].

Resolution of the Supreme Court in the panel of judges of the Second Judicial Chamber of the Criminal Court of Cassation of October 31, 2019 in the case № 404/700/17.  URL: http://www.reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/85390646?fbclid=IwAR2tZAQY2tarcZx2mARwuSORrHf0iXQN9YmCVtxm9VCTxjBPxyvqVxSsSd8. (accased:22.06.2020) [ukr.].

Why a traffic offender cannot be kept in a police car. URL: https://zib.com.ua/ua/142202-espl_poyasniv_chomu_porushnika_pdr_ne_mozhna_trimati_v_polic.html?fbclid=IwAR2PJplPInAC7z_OXY5t9_qL-qNpnMCVpG7PG2U9mpKXouoLMPJSRBB6MJg (accased: 06.05.2020) [ukr.].