PDF 

УДК 340.13:344.2

DOI 10.37566/2707-6849-2022-3-4(40-41)-1

ORCID: 0000-0002-9800-8785

 

Tatiana FULEY,

Head, the Department of the National School of Judges of Ukraine,

Doctor of Law, Honored Lawyer of Ukraine

 

JUSTICE IN WAR CRIMES CASES IN UKRAINE: THE FIRST CHALLENGES

Justice in war crimes cases in Ukraine: the first challenges. Mass atrocities during the full-scale phase of armed aggression against Ukraine inevitably bring up the issue of justice and prosecuting those suspected of committing war crimes. Considering the role of the judiciary, which is essential in a state based on the rule of law as the guarantor of justice, both Ukrainian society and the legal community should be interested in ensuring that the war crimes trials as well as verdicts meet the generally recognized standards of justice. Based on the analysis of verdicts concerning Art. 438 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine (CCU) (violation of the laws and customs of war) issued after the beginning of the full-scale invasion and available in the State registry of court decisions in 19 criminal proceedings, the author identified the challenges that Ukrainian courts face when considering war crimes cases. In 14 criminal proceedings, the defendants were citizens of the Russian Federation (in 13 – servicemen of the Russian Armed Forces, in 1 – also members of a private military company), in 5 – citizens of Ukraine. 15 verdicts out of 19 became final, i.e. 9 of them were not appealed, 1 was changed by a court of appeal, 1 was upheld, and in 4 cases, the appeal proceedings were closed due to the withdrawal of appeals by the accused. War crimes cases are considered new for the Ukrainian judiciary. Therefore, the knowledge of criminal justice system personnel on basic provisions of International Humanitarian Law (IHL) and International Criminal Law is very limited, which resulted in the incorrect qualification of crimes committed in the ATO zone in 2014-2021 as either terrorism or ordinary criminal cases, although some of them had features of war crimes and crimes against humanity. The lack of knowledge on IHL remains relevant even after the full-scale invasion. The author identified it as a key challenge Ukrainian judiciary face when considering criminal proceedings concerning Art. 438 of the CCU. It should be emphasized, however, that according to the Criminal Procedure Code (Art. 337) the court is limited by the charges in the indictment and may go beyond the indictment only if it improves the situation of the accused person. Therefore, courts avoid any actions caused by the shortcomings of the indictment which might be interpreted as worsening the situation of the accused, even if it affects the quality of decisions. Thus, courts do not indicate specific provisions of international treaties to which Art. 438 CCU is referring (i.e. Geneva Conventions or Additional Protocol I) if they are not mentioned in the indictment or use the extensive description of the international armed conflict, which prevails over the assessment of the “nexus” of specific conduct of the accused to the armed conflict. Some other challenges Ukrainian judiciary face when considering war crimes cases including proportionality of the punishment and the impartiality of the judiciary, which were highlighted starting with the first trial in the Shishimarin case.

Key words: justice, rule of law, court, violation of laws and customs of war, war crimes.

 

References

 «Justice will not be quick, but it will definitely be inevitable» — Mykola Gnatovskyy on war crimes. Pravo.ua. 27.04.2022. URL: https://pravo.ua/pravosuddia-bude-ne-shvyd kym-ale-tochno-bude-nemynuchym-mykola-hnatovskyi-provoienni-zlochyny/ [ukr.].

Ukraine begins first war crimes trial of Russian soldier. BBC News. 18 May 2022. URL: https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-61441907

Ukraine fights for values of freedom and democracy, therefore counts on support of civilized world – President. President Of Ukraine Volodymyr Zelenskyy. Official website. 1 March 2022. URL:https://www.president.gov.ua/en/news/ukrayina-voyuye-za-cinnostisvobodi-j-demokratiyi-tomu-rozra-73273

Holovaty S. «Rule of law» does not work. Commentary on the text of the document of the Venice Commission «Report on the rule of law» adopted at the 86th Plenary Meeting, March 25-26, 2011 (CDL-AD (2011) 003rev). 2019 Law Ukr.: Legal J. 39 [ukr.].

Vedernikova I. Iryna Bekeshkina. As long as we are alive, nothing is finally decided. Dzerkalo tyzhnya. 26.03.2019. URL: https://zn.ua/ukr/internal/irina-bekeshkina-pokimi-zhivi-nichogo-ne-virisheno-ostatochno-306366_.html [ukr.].

Report on the rule of law Adopted by the Venice Commission at its 86th plenary session (Venice, 25-26 March 2011). CDL-AD(2011)003rev. URL: https://www.venice. coe.int/webforms/documents/?pdf=CDL-AD(2011)003rev-e

Golubeva A. «In the name of the Russian Federation: this never happened». How Russia prosecutes so-called «fake news» about the war in Ukraine.

BBC News Russian. 3 August 2022. URL: https://bbcrussian.substack.com/p/in-thename-of-the-russian-federation

Convention for the Amelioration of the Condition of the Wounded and Sick in Armed Forces in the Field of 12 August 1949. URL: https://zakon.cc/law/document/ read/995_151 [ukr.].

Geneva Convention relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War of 12 August 1949. URL: https://zakon.cc/law/document/read/995_153 [ukr.].

On the ratification of the Geneva Conventions of August 12, 1949 on the protection of war victims: Decree of the Presidium of the Verkhovna Rada of the Ukrainian SSR dated July 3, 1954. URL: https://zakon.cc/law/document/read/114%D0%B0-03 [ukr.].

On the withdrawal of Ukraine's reservations to the Geneva Conventions for the Protection of War Victims of August 12, 1949: Law of Ukraine of February 8, 2006 No. 3413-IV. URL: https://zakon.cc/law/document/read/3413-15 [ukr.].

Sands Philippe. East West Street: Return to Lviv. Lviv. Vydavnytstvo Staroho Leva, 2017 [ukr.].

Lauterpacht H., The Law of Nations and the Punishment of War Crimes, 21 BYIL, 1944, pp. 58–95.

Criminal Code of Ukraine: Law of Ukraine dated April 5, 2001 No. 2341-III. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2341-14#Text [ukr.].

Criminal code of Ukraine. Scientific and practical commentary: in 2 volumes / by general ed. V. Ya. Tatsiya, V. P. Pshonky, V. I. Borysova, V. I. Tyutyugina. 5th ed., supplement. Kharkiv: Pravo, 2013. Volume 2: Special part / Yu. V. Baulin, V. I. Borisov, V. I. Tyutyugin and others. 2013. 1040 p. [ukr.].

Kononov v. Latvia. App. no. 36376/04. ECtHR Judgement [GC] of 17 May 2010. URL: https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-98669

Kelsen, H. The Rule Against Ex Post Facto Laws and the Prosecution of the Axis War Criminals, 2 The Judge Advocate Journal, 1945, pp. 8–12. URL: https://s3.amazonaws.com/cul-hydra/nur/nur02047/pdfs/nur02047.pdf

Verdict of the Solomyansky District Court of Kyiv city dated 23 May 2022 in the case No. 760/5257/22. URL: https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/104432094 [ukr.].

Decision of the Kyiv Court of Appeal dated 29 July 2022 in the case No. 760/5257/22. URL: https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/105669005 [ukr.].

Verdict of the Kotelevsky District Court of Poltava region dated 31 May 2022 in the case No. 535/244/22. URL: https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/104531363 [ukr.].

Decision of the Poltava Court of Appeal dated 21 September 2022 in the case No. 535/244/22. URL: https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/106448411 [ukr.].

Verdict of the Octyabrsky District Court of Poltava city dated 09 June 2022 in the case No. 554/3925/22. URL: http://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/104701812 [ukr.]

Decision of the Poltava Court of Appeal dated 22 September 2022 in the case No. 554/3925/22. URL: https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/106467791 [ukr.].

Verdict of the Octyabrsky District Court of Poltava city dated 13 June 2022 in the case No. 554/3954/22. URL: http://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/104731235 [ukr.].

Decision of the Poltava Court of Appeal dated 26 September 2022 in the case No. 554/3954/22. URL: https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/106528446 [ukr.].

Verdict of the Octyabrsky District Court of Poltava city dated 13 June 2022 in the case No. 554/3864/22. URL: https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/104739440 [ukr.].

Decision of the Poltava Court of Appeal dated 26 September 2022 in the case No. 554/3864/22. URL: https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/106528443 [ukr.].

Verdict of the Shevchenkivskiy District Court of Kyiv city dated 03 August 2022 in the case No. 761/14035/22. URL: https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/106643372 [ukr.].

Verdict of the Desnyansky District Court of Chernihiv city dated 08 August 2022 in the case No. 750/2891/22. URL: https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/ Review/105614689 [ukr.].

Decision of the Chernihiv Court of Appeal dated 02 November 2022 in the case No. 750/2891/22. URL: https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/107069742 [ukr.].

Verdict of the Novozavodsky District Court of Chernihiv city dated 31 August 2022 in the case No. 751/2961/22. URL: https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/105986768 [ukr.].

Verdict of the Solomyansky District Court of Kyiv city dated 26 September 2022 in the case No. 760/6123/22. URL: https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/106808179 [ukr.].

Verdict of the Kyivo-Svyatoshinsky district court of the Kyiv region dated 17 No vem ber 2022 in the case No. 369/9950/22. URL: https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/ Review/107577110 [ukr.].

Verdict of the Bobrovytsky District Court of Chernihiv region dated 24 November 2022 in the case No. 729/574/22. URL: https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/107481395 [ukr.].

Verdict of the Bobrovytsky District Court of Chernihiv region dated 25 November 2022 in the case No. 729/592/22. URL: https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/107503138 [ukr.].

Verdict of the Podilsky District Court of Kyiv city dated 19 December 2022 in the case No. 758/14216/21. URL: https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/108048620 [ukr.].

Verdict of the Kotelevsky District Court of Poltava region dated 23 December 2022 in the case No. 535/2922/22. URL: https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/108042992 [ukr.].

Verdict of the Kotelevsky District Court of Poltava region dated 26 December 2022 in the case No. 535/2100/22. URL: https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/108069837 [ukr.].

Verdict of the Chernihiv District Court of Chernihiv region dated 10 January 2023 in the case No. 748/2272/22. URL: https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/108302451 [ukr.].

Verdict of the Chernihiv District Court of Chernihiv region dated 12 January 2023 in the case No. 748/1773/22. URL: http://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/108357178 [ukr.].

Decision on the opening of proceedings dated 22 February 2023 in the case No. 748/1773/22. URL: https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/109125851 [ukr.].

Verdict of the Darnytsky District Court of Kyiv city dated 30 January 2023 in the case No. 753/23311/21. URL: https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/108861126 [ukr.].

Verdict of the Chernihiv District Court of Chernihiv region dated 17 February 2023 in the case No. 748/1824/22. URL: https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/109074116 [ukr.].

Cassese A. International Criminal Law. Oxford, 2003.

Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court: Official translation. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/995_588#Text [ukr.].

Additional Protocol to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and relating to the protection of victims of international armed conflicts (Protocol I) of 8 June 1977. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/995_199#Text [ukr.].

On the ratification of the Additional Protocol to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and relating to the protection of victims of international armed conflicts (Protocol I), and the Additional Protocol to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, relating to the protection of victims of non-international armed conflicts (Protocol II): Decree of the Presidium of the Verkhovna Rada of the Ukrainian SSR dated 18 August 1989 No. 7960-XI. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/ show/7960-11#Text [ukr.].

Maliar A. Prosecution of war crimes and crimes against humanity during the international armed confl ict in Ukraine. In: War crimes in Donbas. Challenges in the aspect of bringing the culprits to justice. Kyiv, Moscow, 2020. 12–18. [ukr.].

War Crimes Judicial Education In Ukraine. A Needs Assessment Report. Justice for All. Chemonics International Inc. 2022.

Prosecutor v Tadić. Decision on the Defence Motion for Interlocutory Appeal on Jurisdiction. 2 October 1995. IT-94-1-AR72. URL: https://www.icty.org/x/cases/tadic/ acdec/en/51002.htm

Criminal Procedure Code of Ukraine: Law of Ukraine dated 13 April 2012 No. 4651-VI. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/4651-17#Text [ukr.].

Prosecutor v. Kunarac, Kovac and Vulcovic. IT-96-23 & IT-96-23/1-A.

Elements of Crimes. URL: https://www.icc-cpi.int/sites/default/fi les/Publications/ Elements-of-Crimes.pdf

Prosecutor General’s Office. Crimes committed during the full-scale invasion of the Russian Federation. As of 27.02.2023. URL: https://www.gp.gov.ua/

Geneva Convention relative to the Protection of Civilian Persons in Time of War of 12 August 1949. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/995_154#Text [ukr.].

Tyagniryadno L. «This is genocide. The destruction of Ukrainians as a political nation». What international law says about Ukraine and how Russia will be punished. 20 April 2022. URL: https://rubryka.com/article/mykola-gnatovskyj/ [ukr.].

Jackson P., Waterhouse J. Ukraine war: Russian soldier Vadim Shishimarin jailed for life over war crime. BBC News. 23 May 2022. URL: https://www.bbc.com/news/ world-europe-61549569 58. Pietsch B., Timsit A., Birnbaum M. Westfall S. Russian soldier gets life in prison in Ukraine’s initial war crimes trial. The Washington Post. 23 May 2022. URL: https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2022/05/23/ukraine-russia-soldier-warcrimes-verdict/

The first, but not the last case. The life term of the Russian military offi cer Shishimarin became a signal of Ukraine's determination – the world media. May 24, 2022. NV. 24 May 2022. URL: https://nv.ua/ukr/ukraine/events/sud-zasudiv-vadimashishimarina-do-dovichnogo-uv-yaznennya-reakciya-zahidnih-zmi-50244613.html [ukr.].

The Shishymarin trial: Analytical report of the OZON public monitoring group. Kyiv, 2022. URL: https://ccl.org.ua/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/zvit.-shyshymarin-.pdf [ukr.].

Ambos K. Ukrainian Prosecution of ICC Statute Crimes: Fair, Independent and Impartial? EJIL:Talk! Blog of the European Journal of International Law. June 10 2022. URL: https://www.ejiltalk.org/ukrainian-prosecution-of-icc-statute-crimes-fair-independent-and-impartial/

In three sittings, the court reached a verdict in the case of a Russian who killed a civilian: we record the historical process. Media initiative for human rights. URL: https://mipl.org.ua/sud-za-try-zasidannya-dijshov-do-vyroku-u-spravirosiyanyna-yakyj-ubyv-czyvilnogo-fi ksuyemo-istorychnyj-proczes/ [ukr.].

Russian military Shishimarin's sentence was commuted to 15 years in prison: why is it more logical than life imprisonment. Media initiative for human rights. URL: https://mipl.org.ua/vijskovomu-rf-shyshymarinu-pomyakshyly-vyrok-do-15-rokiv-tyurmy-chomu-cze-logichnishe-za-pozhyttyeve/ [ukr.].

Prikhno A. «There is no sense in hundreds of verdicts without proper evidence», – a judge on war crimes of the Russian Federation. Media initiative for human rights. URL: https://mipl.org.ua/nemaye-zhodnogo-sensu-v-sotnyah-vyrokiv-bez-nalezhnyhdokaziv-suddya-pro-voyenni-zlochyny-rf/ [ukr.].

Rule 100. Fair Trial Guarantees. International Humanitarian Law Databases. URL: https://ihl-databases.icrc.org/en/customary-ihl/v1/rule100#:~:text=essential%20 judicial%20guarantees-,Rule%20100.,aff ording%20all%20essential%20judicial%20 guarantees

Judiciary in Ukraine: historical origins, patterns, development features. Kyiv, Naukova Dumka Publishing House of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, 2014. 502 p. [ukr.]