DISCIPLINARY LIABILITY OF JUDGES UNDER SUBPARAGRAPH (A) OF PARAGRAPH 1 OF ARTICLE 106 OF THE LAW OF UKRAINE «ON THE JUDICIAL SYSTEM AND STATUS OF JUDGES»
УДК 343.162
ORCID: 0000-0001-9939-4713
DOI 10.37566/2707-6849-2023-1(42)-4
Volodymyr RYBALKO,
candidate of Law, chief specialist of the department for the exercise of powers on judicial independence of the department for supporting the activities of members of the High council of justice of the secretariat of the High council of justice
Zhanna SIMONYSHYNA,
Head of the Secretariat of the High Council of Justice
DISCIPLINARY LIABILITY OF JUDGES UNDER SUBPARAGRAPH (A) OF PARAGRAPH 1 OF ARTICLE 106 OF THE LAW OF UKRAINE «ON THE JUDICIAL SYSTEM AND STATUS OF JUDGES»
Based on specific examples (in particular, from the case law of the Grand Chamber of the Supreme Court), the author highlights which offenses of a judge are qualified under subparagraph (1) of paragraph 1 of Article 106 of the Law of Ukraine «On the Judicial System and Status of Judges». The author emphasizes that subparagraph (a) provides for three separate grounds for disciplinary liability of judges (1) unlawful refusal to administer justice (including unlawful refusal to consider claims, appeal and cassation claims on the merits, etc; (2) significant violation of procedural law in the administration of justice, which made it impossible for participants in the trial to exercise their procedural rights and fulfill their procedural obligations; (3) significant violation of procedural law in the administration of justice, which led to a violation of the rules on jurisdiction or composition of the court). Pursuant to that three separate grounds for bringing a judge to disciplinary liability, this article reviews the cases in which the behavior of judges was qualified as an unlawful refusal to administer justice (in particular, unlawful refusal to consider claims, appeal and cassation claims on the merits); or significant violation of procedural law in the administration of justice, which made it impossible for participants in the trial to exercise their procedural rights and perform their, was recognized by the High Council of Justice.
This article will be useful not only for disciplinary inspectors and judges, but also for complainants, as it will help them understand which violations of Law are considered being perspective in terms of appealing against the conduct of a judge to the High Council of Justice.
Key words: disciplinary liability of judges, significant violation of procedural law, unlawful denial of access to justice, impossibility for litigants to exercise their procedural rights and fulfill their procedural obligations, violation of rules on jurisdiction or composition of the court.
References
Simonyshyna Zh.V., Rybalko V. O. Pidstavy dystsyplinarnoi vidpovidalnosti suddiv: praktychnyi posibnyk dlia dystsyplinarnykh inspektoriv. Lviv: Vydavets Viktoriia Kundelska, 2023. 140 s. [ukr.].
Informatsiino-analitychnyi zvit pro diialnist Vyshchoi rady pravosuddia u 2021 rotsi. URL: https://hcj.gov.ua/sites/default/files/field/file/zvit_2021.pdf [ukr.].
Informatsiino-analitychnyi zvit pro diialnist Vyshchoi rady pravosuddia u 2020 rotsi. URL: https://hcj.gov.ua/sites/default/files/field/file/informaciyno-analitychnyy_zvit_ za_2020_rik.pdf [ukr.].
Zakon Ukrainy «Pro sudoustrii i status suddiv». Vidomosti Verkhovnoi Rady Ukrainy. 2016. № 31. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/1402-19#Text [ukr.].
Kuchynska O. P., Shchyhol O. V. Poniattia ta zmist dostupu do pravosuddia v kryminalnomu protsesi Ukrainy. Visnyk kryminalnoho sudochynstva. 2019. № 3. S. 20–30 [ukr.].
Konventsiia pro zakhyst prav liudyny i osnovopolozhnykh svobod. URL: https:// zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show [ukr.].
Mizhnarodnyi pakt pro hromadianski i politychni prava. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/995_043#Text [ukr.].
Konstytutsiia Ukrainy. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua [ukr.].
Balatska O. Dostup do pravosuddia yak zahalna zasada kryminalnoho provadzhennia. Pidpryiemnytstvo, hospodarstvo i pravo. 2020. № 8. S. 262–268. URL: http://pgp-journal. kiev.ua/archive/2020/8/44.pdf [ukr.].
Rishennia u spravi «Multipleks proty Khorvatii». URL: https://ips.ligazakon.net/document/SO1223 [ukr.].
Rishennia u spravi «Kutich proty Khorvatii». URL: https://ips.ligazakon.net [ukr.].
Rishennia Yevropeiskoho sudu z prav liudyny u spravi «Holder (Golder) proty Obiednanoho Korolivstva». URL: https://ips.ligazakon.net [ukr.].
Rishennia Yevropeiskoho sudu z prav liudyny u spravi «Skopelliti proty Italii». URL: https://hudoc.echr.coe.int [ukr.].
Rishennia Yevropeiskoho sudu z prav liudyny u spravi «B. proty Avstrii». URL: https://ips.ligazakon.net [ukr.].
Rishennia Yevropeiskoho sudu z prav liudyny u spravi «Holder proty Spoluchenoho Korolivstva». URL: http://eurocourt.in.ua [ukr.].
Rishennia Yevropeiskoho sudu z prav liudyny u spravi «Kempbell i Fell proty Spoluchenoho Korolivstva». URL: https://hudoc.echr.coe.int [ukr.].
Rishennia Yevropeiskoho sudu z prav liudyny u spravi «Eiri proty Irlandii». URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua [ukr.].
Rekomendatsiia № R(93)1 Komitetu Ministriv Rady Yevropy derzhavam-chlenam pro efektyvnyi dostup do zakonu i pravosuddia dlia naibidnishykh verstv naselennia, ukhvalena Komitetom Ministriv Rady Yevropy na 484 zasidanni zastupnykiv ministriv 8 sichnia 1993 roku. URL: https://old.vkksu.gov.ua [ukr.].
Rekomendatsii Komitetu ministriv Rady Yevropy «Pro shliakhy polehshennia dostupu do pravosuddia». URL: https://court.gov.ua [ukr.].
Hroshevyi Yu. M. Realizatsiia pryntsypu dostupnosti pravosuddia u pobudovi sudovoi systemy Ukrainy. Pytannia udoskonalennia sudovoi systemy Ukrainy: materialy nauk.-prakt. konf. / redkol.: Yu. V. Baulin (holov. red.) ta in. Kharkiv: Krossroud, 2007. S. 33–35 [ukr.].
Rishennia Yevropeiskoho sudu z prav liudyny u spravi «Kaisin ta inshi proty Ukrainy». URL: http://eurocourt.in.ua [ukr.].
Rishennia Yevropeiskoho sudu z prav liudyny u spravi «Khornsbi proty Hretsii». URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua [ukr.].
Ovcharenko O. M. Dostupnist pravosuddia ta harantii yoho realizatsii: monohrafiia. Kharkiv: Pravo, 2008. 304 s. [ukr.].
Sakara N. Yu. Problema dostupnosti pravosuddia u tsyvilnykh spravakh: monohrafiia. Kharkiv: Pravo, 2010. 256 s. [ukr.].
Bondarchuk R. A. Administratyvno-pravove rehuliuvannia protsedury prytiahnennia suddi do dystsyplinarnoi vidpovidalnosti: dys. … kand. yuryd. nauk: 12.00.07. Zaporizhzhia, 2021. URL: http://phd.znu.edu.ua/page/dis/ 07_2021/Bondarchuk.pdf [ukr.].
Kryminalnyi protsesualnyi kodeks Ukrainy. URL: https://zakon. rada.gov.ua/laws/show/4651-17#Text [ukr.].
Tsyvilnyi protsesualnyi kodeks Ukrainy. URL: https://zakon. rada.gov.ua/laws/show/1618-15#Text [ukr.].
Kodeks administratyvnoho sudochynstva Ukrainy. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2747-15#Text [ukr.].
Petrenko N. O. Pidsudnist sprav hospodarskym sudam Ukrainy; Bezpidstavne ototozhnennia «pidsudnosti» z «yurysdyktsiieiu» (pidvidomchistiu). URL: https:// lexinform.com.ua/sudova-praktyka/bezpidstavne-ototozhnennya-pidsudnosti-z-yurysdyktsiyeyu-pidvidomchistyu/ [ukr.].
Postanova Plenumu vid 01.03.2013 roku № 3 Vyshchoho spetsializovanoho sudu Ukrainy z rozghliadu tsyvilnykh i kryminalnykh sprav «Pro deiaki pytannia yurysdyktsii zahalnykh sudiv ta vyznachennia pidsudnosti tsyvilnykh sprav». URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/v0003740-13#Text [ukr.].
Postanova Verkhovnoho Sudu vid 27 lystopada 2018 roku u spravi № 804/3516/18.URL: https://alibi.dp.ua [ukr.].
Postanova Velykoi Palaty Verkhovnoho Sudu vid 06 chervnia 2018 roku u spravi № 495/6724/17. URL: https://verdictum.ligazakon.net [ukr.].
Postanova Verkhovnoho Sudu u skladi kolehii suddiv Kasatsiinoho administratyvnoho sudu 30 sichnia 2020 roku sprava № 640/11758/19, administratyvne provadzhennia № K/9901/28604/19 (YeDRSRU № 87268075) URL: https://alibi.dp.ua [ukr.].
Postanova Verkhovnoho Sudu u skladi kolehii suddiv Kasatsiinoho administratyvnoho sudu vid 03 hrudnia 2020 roku u spravi № 522/19646/17, provadzhennia № K/9901/1534/1. URL: https://zakononline.com.ua/court-decisions/show/93301870 [ukr.].
Dystsyplinarna praktyka Vyshchoi rady pravosuddia i sudova praktyka v dystsyplinarnykh spravakh stosovno suddiv v 2019–2020 rokakh. Analitychnyi zvit z rekomendatsiiamy za rezultatamy monitorynhu. URL: https://hcj.gov.ua/page/lokalni- akty-u-sferi-pravosuddya [ukr.].