IN THE FOCUS OF ATTENTION: QUALIFICATION IN THE TOTALITY OF ARTICLE 111 «HIGH TREASON» AND PARTS 2, 5 OR 7 OF ARTICLE 111-1 «COLLABORATION» OF THE CRIMINAL CODE OF UKRAINE

IN THE FOCUS OF ATTENTION: QUALIFICATION IN THE TOTALITY OF ARTICLE 111 «HIGH TREASON» AND PARTS 2, 5 OR 7 OF ARTICLE 111-1 «COLLABORATION» OF THE CRIMINAL CODE OF UKRAINE  

 

УДК 343.32

ORCID: 0000-0002-7582-2071

ORСID: 0000-0002-8679-124X

DOI 10.37566/2707-6849-2023-3(44)-1

PDF

 

Natalya ANTONYUK,

Judge of the Supreme Court, secretary of the First Judicial Chamber of the Cassation Criminal Court of the Supreme Court, PhD in Law, Associate Professor

 

Zoe ZAHYNEI-ZABOLOTENKO,

Head of the Department of Analytical and Legal Work of the Criminal Court of Cassation, Department of Analytical Assistance to Courts of Cassation and the Grand Chamber of the Supreme Court, Department of Analytical and Legal Work of the Supreme Court, Doctor of Legal Sciences, Professor

 

IN THE FOCUS OF ATTENTION: QUALIFICATION IN THE TOTALITY OF ARTICLE 111 «HIGH TREASON» AND PARTS 2, 5 OR 7 OF ARTICLE 111-1 «COLLABORATION» OF THE CRIMINAL CODE OF UKRAINE

         The article proves that the voluntary occupation by a citizen of Ukraine of a position not related to the implementation of organizational, administrative or administrative and economic functions in illegal authorities established in the temporarily occupied territory, including in the occupation administration of the aggressor state (Part 2 of Article 111-1 of the Criminal Code) or positions related to the performance of such functions (Part 5 of Article 111-1 of the Criminal Code), or positions in illegal judicial or law enforcement bodies created in the temporarily occupied territory (Part 7 of Article 111-1 of the Criminal Code) and further exercise of his professional function in these positions requires qualification in the aggregate of Part 2 of Article 111 and parts 2, 5 or 7 of Article 111-1 of the Criminal Code.

The analysis of judicial practice established that there are three approaches to the qualification of actions of citizens of Ukraine in this case: 1) in parts 2, 5 or 7 of Art. 111-1 of the Criminal Code; 2) under Part 2 of Article 111 of the Criminal Code; 3) under part 2 of article 111 and parts 2, 5 or 7 Art. 111-1 of the Criminal Code. It is established that the scientific literature is dominated by the approach according to which the actions of such a collaborator are subject to qualification only in parts 2, 5 or 7 of Art. 111-1 of the Criminal Code.

It is determined that the voluntary illegal occupation by a citizen of positions in illegally created authorities in the temporarily occupied territory (parts 2, 5, 7 of Art. 111-1 of the Criminal Code) is a special type of high treason in the form of switching to the side of the enemy during an armed conflict (Article 111 of the Criminal Code). Therefore, in this part, the actions of citizens of Ukraine are subject to qualification according to a special norm placed in parts 2, 5, 7 of Art. 111-1 of the Criminal Code). At the same time, the exercise of a professional function by a citizen of Ukraine in such positions is committed after the previous crime is completed, and therefore requires independent qualification as high treason in the form of assistance in conducting subversive activities against Ukraine.

Key words: collaboration, treason, voluntary occupation, temporarily occupied territory, conditions of martial law, totality, qualification, crime, criminal offense.

 

References

On Amendments to Certain Legislative Acts of Ukraine on Establishing Criminal Liability for Collaboration: Law of Ukraine of 03.03.2022 No. 2108-IX. URI: https://zakon. rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2108-20#n12 [ukr.]

The verdict of the Khortitsky District Court of Zaporozhye from the 23.10.2023 in the case № 337/4238/22. URL: https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/114338964# [ukr.]

Verdict of the Kyiv District Court of Kharkov from the 24.04.2023 in the case № 953/1153/23. URL: https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/110425096 [ukr.]

Verdict of the Kharkiv Court of Appeal from 28.09.2023 in the case № 953/1153/23. URL: https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/113837332# [ukr.]

The verdict of the Ivano-Frankivsk City Court of the Ivano-Frankivsk Region from the 05.01.2023 in the case № 344/14125/22. URL: https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/ Review/108280725# [ukr.]

Verdict of Rivne City Court of Rivne Region from the 17.05.2023 in the case № 569/10723/22. URL: https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/114047077# [ukr.]

Verdict Chervonozavodsky District Court of Kharkov from the 21.07.2023 in the case № 646/1887/23. URL: https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/112339894# [ukr.]

The verdict of the Vinnitsa city court of Vinnitsa region from the 20.04.2023 in the case № 127/22095/22. URL: https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/110334773# [ukr.]

Ruling of Vinnytsia Court of Appeal from the 12.06.2023 in the case № 127/22095/22. URL: https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/111574861 [ukr.]

Verdict Shevchenko District Court of Chernivtsi from the 13.10.2023 in the case № 727/8763/23. URL: https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/114195833# [ukr.]

Verdict Shevchenko District Court of Chernivtsi from the 09.03.2023 in the case № 727/8450/22. URL: https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/109469566 [ukr.]

The verdict of the Kommunarsky district court of Zaporozhye from the 25.09.2023 in the case. URL: https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/113908263# [ukr.]

Verdict of the Oktyabrsky District Court of Zaporozhye from the 13.03.2023 in the case № 331/2611/22. URL: https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/109492361 [ukr.]

Vasilenko Yu. V. on the issue of distinguishing collaboration from treason. The European choice of Ukraine, the development of science and national security in the realities of large-scale military aggression and global challenges of the 21st century (to the 25th anniversary of the National University «Odessa Law Academy» and the 175th anniversary of the Odessa School of Law): in the 2 of volume: materials of the International Scientific and Practical Conference (Odessa, June 17, 2022 ) / edited by S. V. Kivalov. Odessa: Publishing House «Helvetica», 2022. Т. 2. Р. 271–273 [ukr.].

Zaitsev O. V. Collaboration as a kind of treason (based on the materials of judicial practice 2014–2022) // Scientific Bulletin of Uzhgorod National University, Series Law. 2023. Vol. 78: Part 2. Р. 174–179 [ukr.].

Kravchuk A. Bondarenko M. Collaboration: analysis of the new article 111-1 of the Criminal Code / NGO «Human Rights Vector». Kyiv, 2022. URL: http://hrvector.org/ podiyi/22-03-20-mbo [ukr.]

Khavronyuk M. Criminal liability for collaboration. Analysis of an article on collaboration from a series of scientific and practical comments by Mykola Khavronyuk on changes to the Criminal Code adopted during martial law. URL: https://pravo.org.ua/ blogs/kolaboratsijna-diyalnist-nova-stattya-kryminalnogo-kodeksu/ [ukr.]

Movchan R. O. «Military» novels of the Criminal Code of Ukraine: law-making and law-enforcement problems: monograph. Kyiv: Norm of Law, 2022. 244 р. [ukr.]

Pisalsky E. O., Movchan R. A. Novels of the criminal legislation of Ukraine on collaboration: discussion issues and an attempt to resolve them // Legal Electronic Scientific Journal. 2022. № 6. Р. 356–360 [ukr.].

Antoniuk N. O. High treason and collaboration: issues of criminal legal qualification // Word of the National School of Judges of Ukraine. 2021. № 4 (37). Р. 56–68 [ukr.].

Zaginei-Zabolotenko Z. A. Voluntary occupation of a position by a citizen of Ukraine in illegal authorities established in the temporarily occupied territory, as well as in illegal judicial or law enforcement agencies as a form of collaboration. Legal Scientific Electronic Journal. 2022. № 6. Р. 318–321 [ukr.].

Konchuk N. S. Criminal liability for treason: dissertation... сandidate of Law: 12.00.08 / Lviv State University of Internal Affairs. Lviv, 2019. 218 р. [ukr.]

On Civil Service: Law of Ukraine from the 10.12.2015 № 889-VIII. URL: https:// zakon. rada.gov.ua/laws/show/889-19#Text [ukr.]

Resolution of the Supreme Court from the 27.10.2021 in the case № 759/7443/17. URL: https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/100734866 [ukr.]

Resolution of the Supreme Court from the 21.12.2022 in the case № 759/5737/17. URL: https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/108225763 [ukr.]

Resolution of the Supreme Court from the 22.08.2023 in the case № 759/4148/17. URL: https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/113065878 [ukr.]

Navrotsky V. A. Theoretical problems of criminal legal qualification. Kyiv: Atika,1999. 464 р. [ukr.]