УДК 342.734.3:34.037

ORCID: 0000-0002-9551-1203

DOI 10.37566/2707-6849-2023-2(43)-1

PDF

Mykhailo SAVCHYN,

Director of the Institute of Comparative Public Law and International Law of Uzhgorod National University, Ukrainian Free University, Munich, Germany, Doctor of Law Sciences, Professor

JUDICIAL PROTECTION OF SOCIAL RIGHTS AND RESPECT FOR HUMAN DIGNITY

The article analyzes the idea of protection of social rights based on the universal nature of human rights as the obligation of the state to protect certain goods, in particular, the distribution of goods in the case of unequal economic status of individuals or the occurrence of life circumstances beyond the individual's will. The protection of social rights is also seen through the principle of ubi jus ibi remedium, the fair distribution of goods on the basis of an equal scale of rights and freedoms.

The purpose of the study is to reveal the nature of social protection through the concept of guarantee of rights based on respect for human dignity. In particular, the author reveals the nature of social rights through the duty to protect the state, which is discussed through human dignity, freedom and equality. The author analyzes the jurisprudence of the Constitutional Court of Ukraine on the content of the state's obligation to ensure and protect social rights in the light of the approaches of the European Court of Human Rights. The author demonstrates the approach of the Supreme Court to the constitutional and administrative provision of social rights on the example of cases on social rights. The author formulates a holistic vision of social rights enforcement given the limited resources in the context of war and post-war renewal of Ukraine.

Key words: administrative proceedings, constitutional jurisprudence, duty to protect, human dignity, judicial protection, social rights, the very essence of the right.

References

Ashby v White (1703) 14 St Tr 695, 92 ER 126.

John Rowlse. Teoriya Spravedlyvosti (Osnovy 2001) [ukr.].

Savchyn M. (ed.) Pravove rehulyuvannia ekonomichoi systemy: instytutsii, pravyla, protsedury (VD `Hel`vetyka`) [ukr.].

Marshall T. H. (1964) Citizenship and Social Class 72.

Gosepath Sch. Do obgruntuvannia sotsial`nykh prav lyudyny. In: Gosepath Sch. & Lohmann G. Filosofia prav lyudyny (Nika-Centr 2008) 138 [ukr.].

Ludwig Eckhard. Dobrobut dlia vsikh (Well Books 2023) 232 [ukr.].

Decision of the Constitutional Court of Ukraine № 5-р/2018 dated 22 May 2018. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/v005p710-18#Text

Garlitsky L. L. Pol`sky Konstitutsiyny Trybunal i sotsial`nye prava (2000) 1 Constitutional Law: East-European Review 157–161 [ukr.].

The decision of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Lithuania of 8 August 2006. Official Gazette Valstybės žinios (2006, No. 88-3475) [ukr.].

Koukal, Pavel (2019). Autorské právo, public domain a lidská práva. 1. vydání. Brno: Masarykova univerzita 271.

Birmontiene T., Yarasyunas E., Spruogis E. General`ny doklad XIV Kongressa Konferentsii evropeiskikh konstitutsionnukh sudov 2008 2(40)–3(41) Konstitutsionnoe pravosudie: Vestnik Konferentsii organov konstitutsionnogo kontrolia stran molodoy demokratii 70–245 [rus.].

Postanova KAS VS u spravi 564/189/17 dated 13.06.2019. URL: https://reyestr. court.gov.ua/Review/82384302 [ukr.].

Postanova KAS VS u spravi 440/2722/20 dated 29.09.2020. URL: http://www.reyestr. court.gov.ua/Review/91883790 [ukr.].

Postanova KAS VS u spravi 580/1869/22. URL: https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/ Review/107632056 [ukr.].

Postanova KAS VS u spravi 560/8064/22. URL: https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/ Review/1115365748 [ukr.].

Postanova KAS VS u spravi 580/4850/22 dated 27.07.2023. URL: https://reyestr. court.gov.ua/Review/112470514 [ukr.].

Postanova KAS VS u spravi 520/22027/21 dated 22.06.2023. URL: https://protocol. ua/ua/postanova_kas_vp_vid_22_06_2023_roku_u_spravi_520_22027_21/ [ukr.].

Postanova KAS VS u spravi 240/12017/19 dated 31.03.2021. URL: https://reyestr. court.gov.ua/Review/95946021 [ukr.].

Postanova KAS VS u spravi 429/3281/13-а. URL: https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/ Review/96706614 [ukr.].

Postanova KAS VS u spravi 266/177/17 dated 10.04.2019. URL: https://reyestr. court.gov.ua/Review/81046682 [ukr.].

Postanova KAS VS u spravi 263/10322/16-а dated 30.06.2021. URL: https://reyestr. court.gov.ua/Review/97976956 [ukr.].

Postanova KAS VS u spravi 747/301/17. URL: https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/ Review/84362986 [ukr.].

Postanova KAS VS u spravi 420/219/19 dated 15.07.2020. URL: https://reyestr. court.gov.ua/Review/90425223 [ukr.].

Postanova KAS VS u spravi 758/859/16-а dated 25.05.2020. URL: https://reyestr. court.gov.ua/Review/89434096 [ukr.].

Postanova KAS VS u spravi 2040/7370/18 dated 21.06.2023. URL: https://reyestr. court.gov.ua/Review/111692328 [ukr.].

Postanova KAS VS u spravi 592/11832/17 dated 29.07.2020. URL: https://reyestr. court.gov.ua/Review/90674225 [ukr.].

Postanova KAS VS u spravi 824/63/18-а dated 28.09.2022. URL: https://reyestr. court.gov.ua/Review/106492345 [ukr.].

Postanova KAS VS u spravi 320/6735/18 dated 02.08.2023. URL: https://reyestr. court.gov.ua/Review/112587830 [ukr.].

Eveline T. Feteris. (2016) Prototypical Argumentative Patterns in a Legal Context: The Role of Pragmatic Argumentation in the Justification of Judicial Decisions 30 Argumentation 65.

Adam Wyner and Trevor Bench-Capon (2008) Modeling Judicial Context in Argumentation Frameworks 3 URL: https://cgi.csc.liv.ac.uk/~tbc/publications/ adamContext.pdf

Postanova KAS VS u spravi 635/7878/16-а dated 15.09.2020 URL: http://www. reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/91538349 [ukr.].

Savchyn M. Porivnyal`ne konstytutsiyne pravo (Yurinkom Inter 2019) 123 [ukr.].

Decision of the Constitutional Court of Ukraine № 1-р(ІІ)/2022 dated 06 April 2022. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/v001p710-22#Text [ukr.].